We have SSO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #317,759 by beepster 11/24/09 10:14:39 AM Reply	We have SSO And I still need to maintain about a dozen different sets of credentials. Its a PITA that is not going to go away. I will choose a path that's clear. I will choose freewill.
Post #317,762 by drook 11/24/09 11:15:19 AM Reply	We have SSO-ish I have a single username/password that is synchronized across (nearly) all systems. But I still have to type it in again whenever I launch a new system. -- Drew
Post #317,776 by pwhysall 11/24/09 3:34:59 PM Reply	Right now, I'd settle for that.

The madness! The madness! Credential Craziness! - (pwhysall) - (12) - Nov. 24, 2009, 02:56:31 AM EST

Let Microsoft manage it all. They've got GREAT... - (folkert) - (2) - Nov. 24, 2009, 08:47:17 AM EST

Hailstorm! No ... Palladium! No, wait ... - (drook) - (1) - Nov. 24, 2009, 09:14:19 AM EST

no, they use AD - (boxley) - Nov. 24, 2009, 09:56:43 AM EST

We have SSO - (beepster) - (2) - Nov. 24, 2009, 10:14:39 AM EST

We have SSO-ish - (drook) - (1) - Nov. 24, 2009, 11:15:19 AM EST

Right now, I'd settle for that. -NT - (pwhysall) - Nov. 24, 2009, 03:34:59 PM EST

It is something that Linux needs to get on top of. - (static) - (5) - Nov. 24, 2009, 06:36:42 PM EST

radius, been around forever -NT - (boxley) - (2) - Nov. 24, 2009, 06:43:06 PM EST

That's designed for dial-in network authentication. - (static) - (1) - Nov. 24, 2009, 06:52:28 PM EST

not just for dialup - (boxley) - Nov. 24, 2009, 09:13:08 PM EST

LDAP - (folkert) - Nov. 24, 2009, 10:34:52 PM EST

NIS is much easier to manage and less fragile than NIS+ - (jake123) - Nov. 26, 2009, 10:06:49 AM EST

s/\$lrpd_saying/This space intentionally left blank./g
46 ms