Stupid name, too.

1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #317,114 by malraux 11/11/09 10:09:20 AM Reply	Stupid name, too. For Googling purposes, that is. Regards, -scott Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson.
Post #317,123 by drook 11/11/09 11:05:40 AM Reply	No, brilliant How do you search for "Word"? Well, you have to search for "Microsoft Word" or you won't get anything useful. This naming convention ensures that you won't be able to search for anything about Go without being explicitly reminded who "owns" it, regardless of what the license says. -- Drew
Post #317,124 by malraux 11/11/09 11:08:52 AM Reply	For them, yes. But to actually find something, everyone has to call it "Google Go" or that doesn't work. If I write a PostgreSQL wrapper and say it's for the "Go language", no one will find it if they're looking for "Google Go". Regards, -scott Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson.
Post #317,159 by static 11/11/09 6:57:45 PM Reply	Gives a new meaning to 'googlie-goo'. Q:Is it proper to eat cheeseburgers with your fingers? A:No, the fingers should be eaten separately.

Google Go - (Another Scott) - (22) - Nov. 11, 2009, 12:01:32 AM EST

Interesting. - (static) - Nov. 11, 2009, 12:47:01 AM EST

Yay... - (malraux) - (9) - Nov. 11, 2009, 09:49:44 AM EST

Why does one need database drivers? - (boxley) - (5) - Nov. 11, 2009, 09:58:24 AM EST

Re: Why does one need database drivers? - (malraux) - (4) - Nov. 11, 2009, 09:59:58 AM EST

any language worth scrapdoodle should be able to callout -NT - (boxley) - (2) - Nov. 11, 2009, 10:14:13 AM EST

Re: any language worth scrapdoodle should be able to callout - (malraux) - (1) - Nov. 11, 2009, 10:18:22 AM EST

Ouch. - (static) - Nov. 11, 2009, 07:00:44 PM EST

Still...I think it might still have better support than... - (Mycroft_Holmes_Iv) - Nov. 11, 2009, 11:58:53 PM EST

Ben's thinking about that, too. - (Another Scott) - (2) - Nov. 20, 2009, 12:29:59 AM EST

Let's hope the guy pays attention - (crazy) - Nov. 20, 2009, 07:13:35 AM EST

That's a good read. - (static) - Nov. 20, 2009, 07:53:15 PM EST

Stupid name, too. - (malraux) - (3) - Nov. 11, 2009, 10:09:20 AM EST

No, brilliant - (drook) - (2) - Nov. 11, 2009, 11:05:40 AM EST

For them, yes. - (malraux) - (1) - Nov. 11, 2009, 11:08:52 AM EST

Gives a new meaning to 'googlie-goo'. -NT - (static) - Nov. 11, 2009, 06:57:45 PM EST

For a non-programmer... - (pwhysall) - (5) - Nov. 12, 2009, 01:53:17 AM EST

Where C sits in the development stack. - (static) - (4) - Nov. 12, 2009, 07:08:07 AM EST

yeah and like GC solves that - (boxley) - (1) - Nov. 12, 2009, 08:01:46 AM EST

They must have some empirical data to support that choice. - (static) - Nov. 12, 2009, 08:01:26 PM EST

All the speed of Python and the convenience of C, eh? -NT - (pwhysall) - (1) - Nov. 12, 2009, 03:23:56 PM EST

I think they intended the other way around. - (static) - Nov. 12, 2009, 07:58:30 PM EST

I have an invitation for you guys. - (jake123) - Nov. 12, 2009, 03:51:40 PM EST

I wasn’t quite sure what to say so I told them I thought they were both insane and just wanted to buy my sprinkler parts.
57 ms