IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Whither Scripting? Forum / You can bet on that
Post #316,850
by scoenye
11/6/09 7:52:51 PM
Reply
New You can bet on that
Yesterday, I was about to comment on the 20 x 10GB/day load you were expecting, but then figured this was on a LAN.

That would be a sustained 23 Mb/s for 24 hours straight.

Even if your download speeds allow it, the uploader better have deep pockets...

Post #316,875
by crazy
11/7/09 11:46:01 AM
Reply
New Other way around
Office with 2 net connections, no idea how fast.

Server in the server room,I have to process these files by sending them offsite (via internet) to service provider who does stuff with them, and sends them back. So triple the actual usage. Oh, and the the final files have to be sent back to the client via ftp pushes or web pickup. Quadruple it.

Current usage has client or us ftp slinging these around already, but current usage is about 30GB per week.

So:
#1: Let the curent clients upload them via self-serve website.
#2: As we add clients, add bandwidth as needed. The additional processing will pay for it, or, I'll move to a cohosted box that has cheaper bandwidth.

All my stuff is running in VMWare instances (both Linux and Windows), so the physical location should not matter.
     PHP upload widget/library? - (crazy) - (23) - Nov. 4, 2009, 04:12:54 AM EST
         Re: PHP upload widget/library? - (folkert) - (22) - Nov. 4, 2009, 07:50:19 AM EST
             Oh, that's not the issue. - (crazy) - (21) - Nov. 4, 2009, 09:58:08 AM EST
                 For EXT2 and older filesystems... - (folkert) - Nov. 4, 2009, 12:08:39 PM EST
                 That's a very very very big file. - (static) - (19) - Nov. 4, 2009, 05:46:50 PM EST
                     Yup - (crazy) - (18) - Nov. 5, 2009, 07:30:13 AM EST
                         I'd be looking at an SFTP or SCP solution. -NT - (static) - (17) - Nov. 5, 2009, 06:02:58 PM EST
                             same here -NT - (boxley) - Nov. 5, 2009, 06:45:42 PM EST
                             I wish - (crazy) - (15) - Nov. 6, 2009, 06:23:16 AM EST
                                 Is chopping up the file into < 2 GB chunks an option? - (Another Scott) - (1) - Nov. 6, 2009, 07:49:50 AM EST
                                     Unlikely - (crazy) - Nov. 6, 2009, 08:02:17 AM EST
                                 You can bet on that - (scoenye) - (1) - Nov. 6, 2009, 07:52:51 PM EST
                                     Other way around - (crazy) - Nov. 7, 2009, 11:46:01 AM EST
                                 a place I used to work used sftp to send files - (boxley) - (10) - Nov. 6, 2009, 09:52:13 PM EST
                                     Been there, done that - (crazy) - (9) - Nov. 7, 2009, 11:48:17 AM EST
                                         I'd seriously consider - (Mycroft_Holmes_Iv) - (8) - Nov. 8, 2009, 10:55:49 PM EST
                                             How would you handle the client side? - (crazy) - (7) - Nov. 9, 2009, 07:41:08 AM EST
                                                 build a web based wrapper for it. -NT - (boxley) - (6) - Nov. 9, 2009, 08:54:54 AM EST
                                                     How convenient - (crazy) - (5) - Nov. 9, 2009, 11:15:31 AM EST
                                                         I KNOW! - (folkert) - Nov. 9, 2009, 12:10:58 PM EST
                                                         start here - (boxley) - (3) - Nov. 9, 2009, 12:58:42 PM EST
                                                             Help a lot - (crazy) - Nov. 10, 2009, 02:22:04 AM EST
                                                             That's a possibility... - (Mycroft_Holmes_Iv) - (1) - Nov. 10, 2009, 08:49:36 AM EST
                                                                 No icons - (crazy) - Nov. 10, 2009, 05:07:42 PM EST

Even the hydrocoptic marzelvane came up with a null...
84 ms