Again, look at what started this
I was talking about Box's statement about unions. Instead of CEOs or Wall Street, fill in !$unions if it makes you feel better. Whoever it is that unions are negotiating with. Whoever it is that Box said unions should partner with.
His statement was that unions are good if and only if they partner with ... well, pick your label, but he clearly meant the people running the company the union members work for.
I suggest instead that unions exist because there are companies that otherwise don't treat their employees as partners.
See? He said something about unions, I disagreed, and said essentially the opposite thing about unions. But we both said something about unions. If you'd rather talk about the saintly intentions of CEOs and defend them against my outrageous and untrue aspersions, go right ahead. As long as you understand that I was talking about unions.
