IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Thats a pretty bold assertion they make
without a whole lot of economic citations to back it up. It is an exceptional recovery simply because it wasn't squashed by roughly a doubling of energy costs.

Agendas. Everyone has one.
Too much of today's music is fashionable crap dressed as artistry.Adrian Belew
New I thought you argued that energy costs don't matter much?
[link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=248099|#248099].

Coming around to [link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=146800|my way of thinking], eh?

;-)

Cheers,
Scott.
New Huh?
No, that was not an argument that energy costs don't matter. Only a statement that the increase had not derailed the economy.

And your chart would seem to indicate what I was saying in the previous posts...this recovery is INDEED exceptional..as oil prices have more than doubled since your post and growth has continued.

So if thats your point, then I agree...somehow I don't think that was your point, though.

Just a hunch :-)
Too much of today's music is fashionable crap dressed as artistry.Adrian Belew
New I think we'll be paying the piper relatively soon. Images.
Someone on NPR this morning said that he thought that there hadn't been a recession this time (as opposed to 1973-1974, 1991, etc.) because the Federal Reserve hadn't assumed that inflation was going to go out of control and increased interest rates. I wouldn't be surprised if that was also a major factor. 0% interest rates for car purchases certainly helped keep things moving for quite a while.

Lots of things were happening in earlier oil price spikes that contributed to those recessions (Watergate, Iran hostages, etc., etc.). We've been "lucky" that many factors are helping to mitigate the effect on the economy this time around (especially easy money for one). While we can argue the importance of Bush's tax cuts, we can't ever really know. Color me skeptical, though.

I think that eventually $80+/bbl oil is going to do bad things to us. Whether we'll muddle along for another 6 months or 3 years, I obviously can't say. As you and others have noted, developing countries like China may be hurt more than the US if prices keep climbing.

It doesn't look like the factors keeping the price high this time around are the same as in the past - there's not additional production that's coming on like to take power away from OPEC as there was in the 1980s, and demand is rising very rapidly now.

The overall trend since late 2004 doesn't look too promising to me:

[image|http://www.bea.gov/briefrm/gdp.gif|0|Real GDP Growth in USA|472|641]


[image|http://www.wtrg.com/oil_graphs/oilprice1947.gif|0|Oil prices in constant 2006 dollars|600|800]


(Oil crossed $30/barrel somewhere in 2003-2004.)

So, in terms of the post-1973 oil price spikes, this has been an "exception" in some respects. The trouble is, as always, comparisons to the past are imperfect.

We'll see.

Cheers,
Scott.
     Captives of the Supply Side - (Seamus) - (15)
         are tax revenues up or down? - (boxley) - (14)
             Down by some indicators. - (admin) - (2)
                 last time I checked Michigan isnt a supply sider state -NT - (boxley) - (1)
                     So? - (admin)
             Did you even read the opinion? - (Seamus) - (10)
                 couple of nits - (boxley) - (9)
                     C'mon box - (bepatient)
                     Your cites are mixing lots of things together. - (Another Scott) - (4)
                         Thats a pretty bold assertion they make - (bepatient) - (3)
                             I thought you argued that energy costs don't matter much? - (Another Scott) - (2)
                                 Huh? - (bepatient) - (1)
                                     I think we'll be paying the piper relatively soon. Images. - (Another Scott)
                     Could it be that corporate revenue increased - (Seamus) - (2)
                         a very small part of it - (boxley)
                         Interesting use of stats - (bepatient)

_ZN4_STL4tanhERKNS_7complexIeEE has been targeted for automatic cpu dispatch.
88 ms