dot com era. That is what I was refuting.
Before you decide what the author ignores and what he is claiming you should read the [link|http://www1.worldbank.org/wbiep/fiscalpolicy/friedman.pdf|whole paper]
More betrayus....
- (Simon_Jester)
- (108)
- Sept. 30, 2007, 10:17:08 AM EDT
Is he calling our generals traitors?
- (Seamus)
- Sept. 30, 2007, 10:26:09 AM EDT
a little long on hyperbole
- (boxley)
- (96)
- Sept. 30, 2007, 10:33:43 AM EDT
I don't usually agree with you
- (Seamus)
- (95)
- Sept. 30, 2007, 10:40:52 AM EDT
petraus like macnamara
- (boxley)
- (94)
- Sept. 30, 2007, 08:03:08 PM EDT
What duties are those, Box?
- (jb4)
- Sept. 30, 2007, 10:40:39 PM EDT
Talk about chicken shit
- (Seamus)
- Oct. 1, 2007, 12:01:30 AM EDT
Your "will do what his boss tells him" kind of chicken...
- (CRConrad)
- (91)
- Oct. 1, 2007, 03:12:44 AM EDT
so, they are loading iraqis into ovens now?
-NT
- (boxley)
- (90)
- Oct. 1, 2007, 09:51:41 AM EDT
No, not as far as I know. Why, does that somehow make...
- (CRConrad)
- (89)
- Oct. 1, 2007, 10:50:04 AM EDT
try reading my original post
- (boxley)
- (88)
- Oct. 1, 2007, 10:55:09 AM EDT
SIGH...It gets more and more wrong.
- (CRConrad)
- (87)
- Oct. 1, 2007, 03:22:57 PM EDT
naw, the germans were cheering all the way thru 1941
- (boxley)
- (86)
- Oct. 1, 2007, 04:37:11 PM EDT
Uuh... Yes. Logic much, mr Sequitur Strawman?
- (CRConrad)
- (85)
- Oct. 2, 2007, 02:41:43 AM EDT
were you not comparing a point in time? if not
- (boxley)
- (84)
- Oct. 2, 2007, 10:23:31 AM EDT
Two, actually: Germany, 1932, and USA, 2007.
- (CRConrad)
- (83)
- Oct. 2, 2007, 04:20:02 PM EDT
long as we dont invade russia in winter
- (boxley)
- (82)
- Oct. 2, 2007, 08:52:31 PM EDT
WTF is WRONG with you? Are you stoned out of your...
- (CRConrad)
- (81)
- Oct. 3, 2007, 03:59:59 AM EDT
Now THERE is a funny non-seq
-NT
- (bepatient)
- (80)
- Oct. 3, 2007, 06:57:15 AM EDT
Non? Seemed to follow pretty directly, dinnit? How not?
-NT
- (CRConrad)
- Oct. 3, 2007, 07:28:17 AM EDT
Nah
- (crazy)
- (78)
- Oct. 3, 2007, 07:42:58 AM EDT
the lady's penchant for petty revenge with all the
- (boxley)
- (77)
- Oct. 3, 2007, 09:53:19 AM EDT
Nope, that still doesn't explain WHY you're so mad.
- (CRConrad)
- (17)
- Oct. 3, 2007, 10:37:10 AM EDT
isnt isnt 28 years of clinton bush enuff?
- (boxley)
- (3)
- Oct. 3, 2007, 11:17:36 AM EDT
Re: isnt isnt 28 years of clinton bush enuff?
- (Seamus)
- (2)
- Oct. 3, 2007, 12:21:56 PM EDT
yer right, it just seemed like 28 years
-NT
- (boxley)
- (1)
- Oct. 3, 2007, 06:17:48 PM EDT
It will seem like alot longer, heaven forbid.
-NT
- (bepatient)
- Oct. 3, 2007, 06:35:25 PM EDT
It's because of the pronoun
- (Silverlock)
- (1)
- Oct. 3, 2007, 11:29:57 AM EDT
bullcrap
- (boxley)
- Oct. 3, 2007, 11:32:08 AM EDT
ms I dont know in charge of the gummint?
- (boxley)
- (10)
- Oct. 3, 2007, 06:43:11 PM EDT
Um, her senior thesis isn't sealed any more.
- (Another Scott)
- Oct. 3, 2007, 07:59:11 PM EDT
Bravo! Yeah, that's *exactly* what I mean.
- (CRConrad)
- (8)
- Oct. 4, 2007, 05:38:10 AM EDT
Hey, back in the day - My Gramma used to get reams of those
- (Ashton)
- (1)
- Oct. 4, 2007, 07:32:40 AM EDT
Reminds me of a passage in NDCC.
- (Another Scott)
- Oct. 4, 2007, 07:57:56 AM EDT
funny, you seem ready to convict the current
- (boxley)
- (5)
- Oct. 4, 2007, 09:48:34 AM EDT
When was she named an unindicted co-conspirator?
-NT
- (Seamus)
- Oct. 4, 2007, 10:12:59 AM EDT
Uhh... "slim evidence" for the lies that got you into Iraq?
- (CRConrad)
- (3)
- Oct. 4, 2007, 11:40:54 AM EDT
you gargle yer koolaid this am?
- (boxley)
- (2)
- Oct. 4, 2007, 11:51:13 AM EDT
You're wrong AGAIN!
- (CRConrad)
- (1)
- Oct. 4, 2007, 12:11:44 PM EDT
:-)
-NT
- (boxley)
- Oct. 4, 2007, 12:18:12 PM EDT
As opposed to shrub's penchant for major revenge?
- (crazy)
- (54)
- Oct. 3, 2007, 01:06:23 PM EDT
Fred still says Saddam had WMDs and a nuke program.
- (Another Scott)
- (53)
- Oct. 3, 2007, 01:25:47 PM EDT
box doesn't care
- (crazy)
- (3)
- Oct. 3, 2007, 03:09:43 PM EDT
Perhaps boxley is like me.
- (Another Scott)
- (1)
- Oct. 3, 2007, 03:14:59 PM EDT
I did, once :-)
- (imqwerky)
- Oct. 3, 2007, 03:16:44 PM EDT
exactly
-NT
- (boxley)
- Oct. 3, 2007, 06:18:48 PM EDT
Heck, alot of folks said that
- (bepatient)
- (48)
- Oct. 3, 2007, 06:50:26 PM EDT
she's a whatever it takes kind of guy
- (boxley)
- Oct. 3, 2007, 07:51:01 PM EDT
He said it *two days* ago. He hasn't been paying attention.
- (Another Scott)
- (46)
- Oct. 3, 2007, 08:02:56 PM EDT
the same she who admits she didnt read the intel report?
-NT
- (boxley)
- (35)
- Oct. 3, 2007, 09:52:16 PM EDT
How many did?
- (Another Scott)
- (34)
- Oct. 3, 2007, 10:13:56 PM EDT
a lazy dimbulb is what we need
- (boxley)
- (33)
- Oct. 4, 2007, 09:50:40 AM EDT
Yeah look at what Reagan did for the country
- (Seamus)
- (32)
- Oct. 4, 2007, 10:01:51 AM EDT
dot com era, end of cold war yup all bad things
-NT
- (boxley)
- (31)
- Oct. 4, 2007, 11:23:14 AM EDT
Like the other Bill(Hmm,has anyone seen them both together?)
- (CRConrad)
- Oct. 4, 2007, 11:46:29 AM EDT
Reagan had nothing to do with the dot com era
- (Seamus)
- (29)
- Oct. 4, 2007, 04:36:27 PM EDT
of course lowering taxes hurt the economy...right
-NT
- (boxley)
- (28)
- Oct. 4, 2007, 09:02:14 PM EDT
Reading for comprehension - try it some time
- (Seamus)
- (7)
- Oct. 4, 2007, 09:52:35 PM EDT
Macroeconomics - study it sometime.
-NT
- (bepatient)
- (1)
- Oct. 4, 2007, 09:54:29 PM EDT
Wasn't the issue
-NT
- (Seamus)
- Oct. 4, 2007, 09:56:00 PM EDT
reagan had nothing to do with the collapse of the sovs
- (boxley)
- (4)
- Oct. 5, 2007, 09:12:41 AM EDT
Did you even read the paper by Yegor Gaidar?
- (Seamus)
- (3)
- Oct. 5, 2007, 09:28:35 AM EDT
You must have something against
- (bepatient)
- (2)
- Oct. 5, 2007, 10:01:45 AM EDT
No, its believing that you can cut taxes, increase spending
- (Seamus)
- Oct. 5, 2007, 12:40:59 PM EDT
HOW ROBUST IS THE CURRENT ECONOMIC EXPANSION? (new thread)
- (Seamus)
- Oct. 5, 2007, 01:05:44 PM EDT
The issue was did Reagan cause the collapse of the USSR
- (Seamus)
- (8)
- Oct. 4, 2007, 10:21:15 PM EDT
can you say disinformatsya? probably not
-NT
- (boxley)
- (7)
- Oct. 5, 2007, 09:17:38 AM EDT
I forgot the AEI is all about spreading Russian
- (Seamus)
- (6)
- Oct. 5, 2007, 09:36:19 AM EDT
if they are trying not to repeat past mistakes
- (boxley)
- (5)
- Oct. 5, 2007, 09:45:24 AM EDT
A fear of Soviet control of the middle east wasn't a
- (Seamus)
- (4)
- Oct. 5, 2007, 09:55:39 AM EDT
not for the saudis
- (boxley)
- (3)
- Oct. 5, 2007, 09:59:33 AM EDT
Yeah the huge loss of oil revenue
- (Seamus)
- (2)
- Oct. 5, 2007, 10:44:45 AM EDT
hate to break it to you
- (boxley)
- (1)
- Oct. 5, 2007, 10:48:01 AM EDT
The idea is that the fall of oil prices
- (Seamus)
- Oct. 5, 2007, 12:31:18 PM EDT
The other issue was that Reagan caused the dot com era
- (Seamus)
- (10)
- Oct. 4, 2007, 10:40:54 PM EDT
Maybe a more neutral source
- (Seamus)
- (9)
- Oct. 4, 2007, 10:52:41 PM EDT
Wow, a complete ignorance of globalization
- (bepatient)
- (8)
- Oct. 5, 2007, 07:32:41 AM EDT
So, what is it you're saying here?
- (CRConrad)
- (2)
- Oct. 5, 2007, 07:58:11 AM EDT
Re: So, what is it you're saying here?
- (bepatient)
- (1)
- Oct. 5, 2007, 09:59:06 AM EDT
The claim was that the Reagan deficits produced the
- (Seamus)
- Oct. 5, 2007, 10:40:47 AM EDT
A chaired professor and former Dept chairman
- (Seamus)
- (4)
- Oct. 5, 2007, 09:16:46 AM EDT
dunno, alternate theories by walter williams are offered
- (boxley)
- (3)
- Oct. 5, 2007, 09:23:57 AM EDT
Yes, a supply-sider. There the only ones left who
- (Seamus)
- (2)
- Oct. 5, 2007, 09:47:12 AM EDT
well listening to hillary giving away money
- (boxley)
- (1)
- Oct. 5, 2007, 10:45:49 AM EDT
A supply sider is someone who thinks stimulating
- (Seamus)
- Oct. 5, 2007, 01:24:23 PM EDT
Yes.
- (bepatient)
- (5)
- Oct. 3, 2007, 10:17:54 PM EDT
Not hardly. Fred's an out of touch lightweight.
-NT
- (Another Scott)
- (3)
- Oct. 3, 2007, 10:20:25 PM EDT
We'll see if the party machinery can mold him
- (bepatient)
- (2)
- Oct. 4, 2007, 09:04:45 AM EDT
I think the R machinery knows that none of them can win. ;-)
-NT
- (Another Scott)
- Oct. 4, 2007, 10:04:10 AM EDT
They won't get a chance to mold him
- (Seamus)
- Oct. 4, 2007, 10:04:16 AM EDT
Apparently
- (Simon_Jester)
- Oct. 4, 2007, 10:07:51 PM EDT
In his defense, from all the transcripts I've seen, he...
- (CRConrad)
- (3)
- Oct. 5, 2007, 02:41:34 AM EDT
Hmmm...
- (Another Scott)
- (2)
- Oct. 5, 2007, 07:50:35 AM EDT
Ok, yup, in *that* sense he was wrong.
- (CRConrad)
- (1)
- Oct. 5, 2007, 08:11:27 AM EDT
I'm not willing to give him a break.
- (Another Scott)
- Oct. 5, 2007, 08:53:46 AM EDT
Thank youm thank you, thank you! :)
- (a6l6e6x)
- (3)
- Oct. 6, 2007, 04:17:37 PM EDT
Are you sure it wouldn't be...?
- (CRConrad)
- (2)
- Oct. 6, 2007, 06:40:46 PM EDT
It's a legacy of the "Song Title Game". It's not recent.
-NT
- (Another Scott)
- Oct. 6, 2007, 07:37:54 PM EDT
I'm a native European.
- (a6l6e6x)
- Oct. 6, 2007, 10:52:05 PM EDT
Main difference
- (bepatient)
- (9)
- Sept. 30, 2007, 11:53:24 AM EDT
How much of a difference is this? Not much.
-NT
- (Seamus)
- Sept. 30, 2007, 12:03:45 PM EDT
Actually, I don't believe that...
- (Simon_Jester)
- (7)
- Sept. 30, 2007, 03:11:07 PM EDT
You don't believe an easily recognizable fact?
- (bepatient)
- (6)
- Sept. 30, 2007, 07:31:59 PM EDT
<man type=straw />
- (jb4)
- Sept. 30, 2007, 10:41:55 PM EDT
Re: You don't believe an easily recognizable fact?
- (Simon_Jester)
- (4)
- Sept. 30, 2007, 11:35:31 PM EDT
You know...
- (bepatient)
- (3)
- Oct. 1, 2007, 07:08:17 AM EDT
And you determined that how?
- (hnick)
- (2)
- Oct. 1, 2007, 07:43:10 AM EDT
Simple really
- (bepatient)
- (1)
- Oct. 1, 2007, 09:34:39 AM EDT
I do think some of your analysis is correct (new thread)
- (Simon_Jester)
- Oct. 2, 2007, 09:01:01 AM EDT