does she need to make these "mistakes" in her soundbites before you realize they aren't, in fact, mistakes or misstatements?

And its hard to not call it a forced tax it indeed the state 1) requires you enroll and pay and 2) attaches penalties if you don't.

But her carefully crafted sales document makes it sound wonderful..like how it "offers new choices". Reality is its not a really a choice. Its a government mandate.

There are aspects of the proposal that are fine and, indeed, well thought out. Unification of insurance rules and elimination of "pre-existing condition" outs for companies.

But it also contains language like..."Hillary Clinton\ufffds comprehensive
agenda to lower costs and improve quality will substantially lower costs for employers,
making it easier for all firms to continue coverage or offer new health benefits to their
workers. In return, large employers will be expected to provide health insurance to their employees or make some contribution to the cost of coverage. This responsibility will take into account firms\ufffd size and average wages." Problematic because 1) promises HUGE savings based on "use of modern technology" which we've all heard before..the internet was going to change everything in corporate America and 2) just how do you enforce that "expectation"..and if you increase their expense with this "expectation" all you do is cost people their jobs.