...quite a lot of things.

Like, which "they", exactly, *are* "actually" "Al-Qaida" -- is it enough if *they say* they are?

And as usual it depends, of course, on what the meaning of 'is' -- or in this case, 'are' -- is. How perspicacious of you to use the present tense: Sure, they are there *now* -- but probably only since *after the invasion, because of it*; which kind of disqualifies them from being the *cause* of the invasion that the Smirking-Chimp-in-Chief is trying to sell them as.

Unfortunately, your too-terse echo of him, sans any of the IMO required qualifiers, only tends to reinforce the lie he's peddling.

So please try not to do that any more.

Thank you.