in the argument I had re: omnipotence vs. omniscience (not w/btilly), he seemed quite aware that you couldn't PROVE the non-existence of an omnipotent creator god from within the creation... Not saying he believed in a creator god, y'understand, but he understood the logic - and I believe he understood that the very argument was a logical exercise.

'Strong' and 'weak' as logical terms are fine, but they press the wrong psychological buttons.