IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Hmm... That adds up to 200.7 "%". Of what, calculated how?!?
New Specific significance
I could wing it, but [link|http://mathworld.wolfram.com/StatisticalTest.html|Wolfram's already wung it good].

Measurement of type I and type II error are independent. You're measuring the percentages within two independent populations: spam and non-spam. The overall error would be the sum of the type I and type II errors, over the sum of all mail received.

Any way you add it up, SA rocks hard.
--
Karsten M. Self [link|mailto:kmself@ix.netcom.com|kmself@ix.netcom.com]
[link|http://kmself.ix.netcom.com/|[link|http://kmself.ix.netcom.com/|http://kmself.ix.netcom.com/]]
What part of "gestalt" don't you understand?
     Has anyone tried SpamAssassin? - (ben_tilly) - (5)
         Been using it about a week - (kmself)
         ~1 month out: it rocks my world - (kmself) - (3)
             Hmm... That adds up to 200.7 "%". Of what, calculated how?!? -NT - (CRConrad) - (1)
                 Specific significance - (kmself)
             :-) -NT - (ben_tilly)

This is Helena.
32 ms