IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Networking Forum / it means I must be slow here
Post #2,877
by boxley
7/26/01 10:39:05 AM
Reply
New it means I must be slow here
you entire network 192.0.0.0 is going to you. Shouldnt it read that 192.0.0.0(entire 192 network) should be forwarded to the router? Yer second 192.168.0.255 is redundant you have already set that route. The 224 route is something I have seen ms doing lately but am not enlightened on the cause. Get rid of the 255. route. Try it out and let me know.
thanx,
bill
Our bureaucracy and our laws have turned the world into a clean, safe work camp. We are raising a nation of slaves.
Chuck Palahniuk
Post #2,886
by tseliot
Picture of tseliot
7/26/01 11:21:36 AM
Reply
New Can't get rid of the .255 route
'cause if those packets hit the router, they're not coming back to the correct hosts inside the LAN. But it's moot anyway:
Active Routes:

  Network Address          Netmask  Gateway Address        Interface  Metric
          0.0.0.0          0.0.0.0    192.168.0.110     192.168.0.35       1
          0.0.0.0          0.0.0.0    192.168.0.111     192.168.0.35       1
        127.0.0.0        255.0.0.0        127.0.0.1        127.0.0.1       1
        192.0.0.0        255.0.0.0     192.168.0.35     192.168.0.35       1
     192.168.0.35  255.255.255.255        127.0.0.1        127.0.0.1       1
    192.168.0.255  255.255.255.255     192.168.0.35     192.168.0.35       1
        224.0.0.0        224.0.0.0     192.168.0.35     192.168.0.35       1
  255.255.255.255  255.255.255.255     192.168.0.35     192.168.0.35       1

C:\\WINDOWS>route delete 192.168.0.255
The route specified was not found.

C:\\WINDOWS>route delete 192.0.0.0
The route specified was not found.

C:\\WINDOWS>


I can only stand so much more Windows... <:( Thanks for the try, though.
That's her, officer! That's the woman that programmed me for evil!
     Can *anybody* reach cert.org? - (tseliot) - (9) - July 23, 2001, 11:49:32 AM EDT
         No problem here! -NT - (jlalexander) - July 23, 2001, 12:04:19 PM EDT
         Okay, I think I know why not, but how do I fix? - (tseliot) - (7) - July 24, 2001, 11:35:36 AM EDT
             I'm smarter than I look ;) - (tseliot) - (4) - July 24, 2001, 11:39:51 AM EDT
                 can you not modify the 35 to 10 ? -NT - (boxley) - (3) - July 24, 2001, 07:25:10 PM EDT
                     ? You mean change my own IP from .35 to .10? - (tseliot) - (2) - July 25, 2001, 11:14:06 AM EDT
                         it means I must be slow here - (boxley) - (1) - July 26, 2001, 10:39:05 AM EDT
                             Can't get rid of the .255 route - (tseliot) - July 26, 2001, 11:21:36 AM EDT
             Keep It Simple, Stupid - (ronelson) - (1) - Aug. 1, 2001, 08:46:45 AM EDT
                 Not my idea. :( - (tseliot) - Aug. 1, 2001, 12:10:04 PM EDT

Body piercings don't have this type of torque though.
102 ms