IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Eh?
As written, what you've said is that all of SuSE Linux has to be under GPL v3, because some bits of it are.

This is clearly not the case, because at the very least, X11, Perl and Apache will be in there, all under their own licences.

Or did you mean the kernel?


Peter
[link|http://www.no2id.net/|Don't Let The Terrorists Win]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Home]
Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
[link|http://kevan.org/brain.cgi?pwhysall|A better terminal emulator]
[image|http://i66.photobucket.com/albums/h262/pwhysall/Misc/saveus.png|0|Darwinia||]
New Double Eh?
Ummm . . . I have a hard time reading it that way. Paragraph #1 doesn't refer to Linux or any other SUSE product at all, just incorporating code into a product, any product.

Elsewhere it says "some components" of the SUSE distribution are v3. Doesn't mean the kernel or whetever - a "distribution" includes all kinds of stuff (hell, Debian is up to 21 CDs now).

Redistribute that and you're distributing v3 code.
[link|http://www.aaxnet.com|AAx]
New Re: Double Eh?
Here's the bit I'm querying:

"If your product incorporates any code licensed under GPL v3 your product has to be licensed under [GPL] v3"

Now, if your product is "SuSE Linux 10.0" or whatever, that statement is clearly not true, as the product in question is comprised of a number of components which have various licences, including GPL v2, GPL v3, X11, Artistic, MPL, SPL, Apache and BSD licences - and probably more.

Just because GNU textutils or whatever has been relicenced under GPL v3 has no bearing whatsoever on the licencing of, say, X11.


Peter
[link|http://www.no2id.net/|Don't Let The Terrorists Win]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Home]
Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
[link|http://kevan.org/brain.cgi?pwhysall|A better terminal emulator]
[image|http://i66.photobucket.com/albums/h262/pwhysall/Misc/saveus.png|0|Darwinia||]
     If MS indemnifies one, it indemnifies all. - (Another Scott) - (13)
         No one has mentioned how it is unlikely the kernel will go - (crazy) - (1)
             He's softened his views on later drafts. It's possible now. - (Another Scott)
         Re: If MS indemnifies one, it indemnifies all. - (andread) - (10)
             The developers have to agree to the new license. - (admin) - (1)
                 "Supersedes" </CRC> -NT - (pwhysall)
             You can't downgrade a license. - (Andrew Grygus) - (7)
                 But didn't MS become MS due to its lawyers? - (Another Scott)
                 Have I Got It Right? - (andread) - (2)
                     A copy of old code in your posession . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (1)
                         Thanks -NT - (andread)
                 Eh? - (pwhysall) - (2)
                     Double Eh? - (Andrew Grygus) - (1)
                         Re: Double Eh? - (pwhysall)

None of us is as dumb as all of us.
44 ms