IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New I guess everyone has enough money and too little time



I4 NOW!


Impeach, Indict, Incarcerate, Inject
Bush, Cheney, Gonzalez, Rumsfeld, Rove, Rice
New Don't care for ruby, actually.
Mostly hype, IMO, especially Rails.
Regards,

-scott anderson

"Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
New Rails is OK
but compare to Seaside it just seems so last-century.



I4 NOW!


Impeach, Indict, Incarcerate, Inject
Bush, Cheney, Gonzalez, Rumsfeld, Rove, Rice
New Uh, yeah.
Actually, it has a few real problems as opposed to just not being fashionable.

No Unicode, for one thing. And Rails strikes me as yet another "get the simple stuff done whiz bango, but fall apart for hard stuff" framework.
Regards,

-scott anderson

"Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
New I didn't mean fashionable
I meant, unwieldy. I like working on live systems. Live, as in running while I work on it. Live, as in, faults trigger debuggers, archive the execution state such that I can restore the entire program to examine it, and then keep going. Rails is a dead system. You have to kill the program to change it. How quaint.



I4 NOW!


Impeach, Indict, Incarcerate, Inject
Bush, Cheney, Gonzalez, Rumsfeld, Rove, Rice
New Fashionable == !quaint
You're the one using the words that way, not me. :-)

I've never been one to use debuggers, and a live system isn't worth the hassle of repository-based development. When I do Django development I never have to restart the program either. To each his own.
Regards,

-scott anderson

"Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
New I code in the debugger
then execute it, write, step, write, step....

Guarantee's a high level of quality. If I write a line wrong, I just back up the PC to the outer context, change the line, and test it. I recently had to fix a Java web service and felt absolutely crippled because I couldn't write a couple lines for the wacky string manipulation I was about to do - just to make sure I had it right.

This is the way computers should work.



I4 NOW!


Impeach, Indict, Incarcerate, Inject
Bush, Cheney, Gonzalez, Rumsfeld, Rove, Rice
New I prefer to use unit tests to guarantee quality
They're repeatable and useful for regression testing. I don't have to worry about side effects, either.

As far as immediate Java testing, that's what the Bean Shell is for. Or use the remote debugger if you want. Either way.

Again, different strokes.
Regards,

-scott anderson

"Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
New I do both
Cool thing about SUnit is you click on failed test - brings it up in a debugger - step, analyze, and fix.




I4 NOW!


Impeach, Indict, Incarcerate, Inject
Bush, Cheney, Gonzalez, Rumsfeld, Rove, Rice
New ROFL - Don't know Ruby.

Imric's Tips for Living
  • Paranoia Is a Survival Trait
  • Pessimists are never disappointed - but sometimes, if they are very lucky, they can be pleasantly surprised...
  • Even though everyone is out to get you, it doesn't matter unless you let them win.


Nothing is as simple as it seems in the beginning,
As hopeless as it seems in the middle,
Or as finished as it seems in the end.
 
 
New Nope -just you specified How the problem needed to be solved
I assume you've been learning Ruby, setting something up, so you wanted something to mesh with what you've already done. Maybe to be used as an example for your further education.

So you really don't want an operational solution, you want something to satisfy your curiosity.

I could envision the solution in a couple of hours of Perl, which means I wouldn't mind picking up the cash for it, but you don't want that.
New If I wanted to take lip from a script kiddie
I'd have offered a quart of Mickeys and an iPod.

If I wanted to satisfy my curiosity, I'd pick up a book and hack it out in a day. I don't happen to have the day. For me, a day is worth a kilobuck.

You, a one trick hack pushing dead tree spam, pretending you know anything at all about me and what I want or need is presumptuous.

Its a job son. If you want my nickel, you play my tune. But pseudo psycho analysis from an emotional pygmy is neither expected nor appreciated.

Sod off.



I4 NOW!


Impeach, Indict, Incarcerate, Inject
Bush, Cheney, Gonzalez, Rumsfeld, Rove, Rice
Expand Edited by tuberculosis March 25, 2007, 04:35:15 AM EDT
New My, this is a long yesterday
Wasn't that when you needed it by?

This statement is what I based my assumptions on:

I'm annoyed at ruby's file IO - can't get it working, and I"m short on time

It's seems pretty clear cut, but then again, I DID say "I assume". Which means I can accept being wrong.

And then you decided to attack me. Wierd. So I'll make another assumption.

You REALLY don't like me.

That's OK. I don't mind you. You are interesting, and occasionally entertaining. And often educational.

Of course, that above statement will probably make you start seething, and kick back something about not needing my approval. So I'll beat you to it.

Happy?

Hope you get the solution you need.
New There are three other options.
c) I don't know Ruby.

d) I don't have time to do it, nor to learn Ruby to do it.

e) I didn't see your thread until just now.

Otherwise, I might have given it a go.

Wade.


Is it enough to love
Is it enough to breathe
Somebody rip my heart out
And leave me here to bleed
 
Is it enough to die
Somebody save my life
I'd rather be Anything but Ordinary
Please



-- "Anything but Ordinary" by Avril Lavigne.

· my ·
· [link|http://staticsan.livejournal.com/|blog] ·
· [link|http://yceran.org/|website] ·

     Anybody wanna hack some ruby for a KiloBuck? - (tuberculosis) - (20)
         I guess everyone has enough money and too little time -NT - (tuberculosis) - (13)
             Don't care for ruby, actually. - (admin) - (7)
                 Rails is OK - (tuberculosis) - (6)
                     Uh, yeah. - (admin) - (5)
                         I didn't mean fashionable - (tuberculosis) - (4)
                             Fashionable == !quaint - (admin) - (3)
                                 I code in the debugger - (tuberculosis) - (2)
                                     I prefer to use unit tests to guarantee quality - (admin) - (1)
                                         I do both - (tuberculosis)
             ROFL - Don't know Ruby. -NT - (imric)
             Nope -just you specified How the problem needed to be solved - (crazy) - (2)
                 If I wanted to take lip from a script kiddie - (tuberculosis) - (1)
                     My, this is a long yesterday - (crazy)
             There are three other options. - (static)
         send me enough for a sixpack and download this - (boxley) - (4)
             Wrong spot in the chain - (tuberculosis) - (3)
                 maybe this will help - (boxley)
                 So why does it need to be Ruby? - (admin) - (1)
                     Because I already have a bunch of maintenance script in it - (tuberculosis)
         Done - (tuberculosis)

It's no good shouting out all of these random occurrences where you happen to see the face of the Virgin LRPD in a pancake in Guadalajara.
128 ms