IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Its now under 600USD here.
Its the lowest priced digi SLR that I've seen.
Too much of today's music is fashionable crap dressed as artistry.Adrian Belew
New But not with a superzoom lens
and anyway, the camera can easily become the cheapest part of a SLR system. I just spent $300 on a flash - but it's worth it (e.g. guide number is 54 meters, rotating/swivelling zoom head, second fill flash). Lens easily cost more.

So for an SLR, I'd say consider the whole system, and what's important to you. Overall, all are pretty good, but have specific good points. For example, Sony/KM (the first), Pentax/Samsung (second), and Olympus (last one so far) all have D-SLR's with in-camera stabilization. For low light use, that's a big plus. Canon has the most wonderful USM (silent ultrasonic motor) lenses, and is probably the best for sports right now, etc.

Plus, you should check out how the camera feels - some cameras just feel better than others (and different people have different preferences)

If you're really going for cheap, and dont' plan on buying more stuff (lenses, flashes, etc), stick with a superzoom digicam. Also, consider buying used (e.g. KEH or eBay with appropriate caution).

--Tony
     Camera question - looking to get a 'bridge' digital SLR. - (static) - (18)
         I wouldn't worry about the storage format. - (Another Scott) - (1)
             I've got a Panasonic Lumix FZ-5 - (drewk)
         I just got a Fuji Finepix s5200 - (bionerd)
         whoops- dupe. -NT - (bionerd)
         D40 is the entry point - (bepatient) - (3)
             Still AU$1000 in a system. - (static) - (2)
                 Its now under 600USD here. - (bepatient) - (1)
                     But not with a superzoom lens - (tonytib)
         Better name is "super zoom" - (tonytib)
         I have powershot s2 - (tuberculosis) - (7)
             Re: I have powershot s2 - (SpiceWare) - (6)
                 S3 had just come out - (tuberculosis) - (5)
                     low $300s - (SpiceWare) - (4)
                         It has come down it was $400+ when I looked - get it! -NT - (tuberculosis) - (3)
                             Wide-angle still only 36mm (equiv), though. - (static) - (2)
                                 Is a digital back that uses your existing lenses an option? - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                     Already explored. - (static)
         Interesting find. - (static)

Would you like fries with that?
63 ms