IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 1 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Hmm... no. I'll look into it.
Regards,

-scott anderson

"Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
New Don't waste any time or energy on that.
If you haven't added any such capability, then there most probably is none.

I mean, which is most likely: That I fumble-fingered a "Mark Forum Read" without noticing (extremely likely), or that your code magically acquired a weird (and not quite designable within this system's parameters, when you think about it) capability it hadn't had before (extremely UN-likely)?


   [link|mailto:MyUserId@MyISP.CountryCode|Christian R. Conrad]
(I live in Finland, and my e-mail in-box is at the Saunalahti company.)
Ah, the Germans: Masters of Convoluted Simplification. — [link|http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=1603|Jehovah]
New Sure it's designable
In fact I asked for it once.
===

Kip Hawley is still an idiot.

===

Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link|http://DocHope.com|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats].
[link|http://DocHope.com|http://DocHope.com]
New Yeah, sure, if you change how the whole site works.
Like, now we mark one whole forum read at a time. I thought I saw *a single post* within a forum[*] lose its LRPD. How would that work; where would these per-post timestamps be saved?

That's what I meant by "within the current parameters", or whatever words to roughly that effect I used.




[*]: OK, so that was also "all posts" that were previously unread in that forum, since the one I was replying to was the only unread one I had in the forum. But had there been more than one, it couldn't have worked within the current "mark-entire-forums" concept at all, AFAICS.


   [link|mailto:MyUserId@MyISP.CountryCode|Christian R. Conrad]
(I live in Finland, and my e-mail in-box is at the Saunalahti company.)
Ah, the Germans: Masters of Convoluted Simplification. — [link|http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/?p=1603|Jehovah]
New What I asked for (and sounded ~like what you described)
I post a new topic in a forum that doesn't have anything unread. If, after I post, the only thing in the forum is the one I've just posted then clearly I've read it.

Hmm. I guess it's not really that much like what you described after all. But you know what? I'm okay with that.
===

Kip Hawley is still an idiot.

===

Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link|http://DocHope.com|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats].
[link|http://DocHope.com|http://DocHope.com]
     Hey, izzat new??? - (CRConrad) - (5)
         Hmm... no. I'll look into it. -NT - (admin) - (4)
             Don't waste any time or energy on that. - (CRConrad) - (3)
                 Sure it's designable - (drewk) - (2)
                     Yeah, sure, if you change how the whole site works. - (CRConrad) - (1)
                         What I asked for (and sounded ~like what you described) - (drewk)

Powered by practical applications of the Thing Theory!
138 ms