I'm led to believe that Ocaml is pretty darned quick

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #274,750

by pwhysall

12/4/06 1:56:07 AM

I'm led to believe that Ocaml is pretty darned quick

Peter
[link|http://www.no2id.net/|Don't Let The Terrorists Win]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Home]
Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
[link|http://kevan.org/brain.cgi?pwhysall|A better terminal emulator]
[link|http://darwinia.co.uk/|[image|http://i66.photobucket.com/albums/h262/pwhysall/Misc/saveus.png|0|Darwinia||]]

Post #274,775

by boxley

12/4/06 9:32:00 AM

according to the ocaml resources C is faster

and for better or worse I already know how to mangle C.
thanx,
bill

Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 50 years. meep

programming methodology question - (boxley) - (10) - Dec. 3, 2006, 08:05:41 PM EST

Historically speaking - (ChrisR) - (5) - Dec. 3, 2006, 08:46:48 PM EST

is C still quick compared to - (boxley) - (4) - Dec. 3, 2006, 09:52:37 PM EST

Pattern recognition - (ChrisR) - Dec. 3, 2006, 10:22:54 PM EST

Smalltalk has been used to do OCR - (tuberculosis) - Dec. 4, 2006, 12:09:00 AM EST

I'm led to believe that Ocaml is pretty darned quick -NT - (pwhysall) - (1) - Dec. 4, 2006, 01:56:07 AM EST

according to the ocaml resources C is faster - (boxley) - Dec. 4, 2006, 09:32:00 AM EST

I really think this is going to take genetic algo - (drewk) - (3) - Dec. 3, 2006, 09:57:22 PM EST

so give me something to train -NT - (boxley) - (2) - Dec. 3, 2006, 11:11:12 PM EST

Hey, I'm an idea man - (drewk) - (1) - Dec. 3, 2006, 11:43:03 PM EST

ICLRPD (new thread) - (Steve Lowe) - Dec. 4, 2006, 03:01:11 AM EST

iwethey.org

Ugh. Too bony for soup.
74 ms