We did - he didn't

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #273,994 by tuberculosis 11/26/06 10:35:55 PM 11/26/06 11:06:33 PM Reply	We did - he didn't Anyhow, I like this problem because the data set size is really close to the size of available ram and you can't tell by eyeballing it if you can make it fit or not. You have to think it through. Even then, the usual representations still don't quite fit. So you have to think harder. Which is the whole point. [link\|http://www.blackbagops.net\|Black Bag Operations Log] [link\|http://www.objectiveclips.com\|Artificial Intelligence] [link\|http://www.badpage.info/seaside/html\|Scrutinizer] Edited by tuberculosis Nov. 26, 2006, 11:06:33 PM EST Expand All History
Post #274,002 by admin 11/26/06 11:14:33 PM Reply	Just saying... There's no need to repeat all of the stuff that was said before. Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Post #274,005 by tuberculosis 11/26/06 11:18:18 PM Reply	But we hardly talk about programming at all anymore Did everyone move into management? [link\|http://www.blackbagops.net\|Black Bag Operations Log] [link\|http://www.objectiveclips.com\|Artificial Intelligence] [link\|http://www.badpage.info/seaside/html\|Scrutinizer]
Post #274,008 by Another Scott 11/26/06 11:42:56 PM Reply	:-) I agree that having more programming discussions would be wonderful. Trouble is, we seem to have scared away many of the passionate programmers (BT, TSE, etc.). Even CRC doesn't post here as much as he used to. It's not fair of us to have you carry all the weight. Admin's musings about "articles" would make discussions about programming have a longer life, I think, since they could be made sticky to get more eyeball time. We need more eyeballs here... Cheers, Scott.
Post #274,019 by static 11/26/06 11:59:12 PM Reply	I agree on the eyeballs. I've posted at least two questions I wanted some opinions on and the discussion on one has been non-existent and the other has been limited, but interesting. Wade. "Don't give up!"
Post #274,026 by tuberculosis 11/27/06 12:26:11 AM Reply	I put most of my programming rants on my blog For just the reason you cite. Blog is better bucket for articles. Stevey isn't the only one with drunken blog rants. I suppose I could copy them here when I put up new ones. [link\|http://www.blackbagops.net\|Black Bag Operations Log] [link\|http://www.objectiveclips.com\|Artificial Intelligence] [link\|http://www.badpage.info/seaside/html\|Scrutinizer]

Steve Yegge (who he? - ed) on Perl - (pwhysall) - (62) - Nov. 25, 2006, 07:28:41 PM EST

IRLRPD. (new thread) - (Another Scott) - Nov. 25, 2006, 07:54:59 PM EST

He worked for Amazon for many years - (tuberculosis) - (60) - Nov. 25, 2006, 08:42:36 PM EST

Well based on that ... - (folkert) - (59) - Nov. 25, 2006, 09:50:54 PM EST

Key factors are - (tuberculosis) - (58) - Nov. 25, 2006, 10:08:42 PM EST

do it all the time - (boxley) - Nov. 25, 2006, 10:54:26 PM EST

I have never had an under spec'd system. - (folkert) - (56) - Nov. 26, 2006, 01:56:19 PM EST

More to the point is will it fit on one machine? - (tuberculosis) - (55) - Nov. 26, 2006, 04:44:19 PM EST

I guess I think to simply. - (folkert) - (22) - Nov. 26, 2006, 05:09:35 PM EST

You would filewalk for every query? - (crazy) - (18) - Nov. 26, 2006, 05:22:25 PM EST

RAMFS? -NT - (folkert) - (17) - Nov. 26, 2006, 05:34:52 PM EST

Doesn't matter - (crazy) - (5) - Nov. 26, 2006, 05:49:53 PM EST

That would be a radix-search, I think. - (static) - (3) - Nov. 26, 2006, 05:59:13 PM EST

Nah, you want a hash - (tuberculosis) - (2) - Nov. 26, 2006, 11:18:48 PM EST

I thought a radix search was also O(1). - (static) - (1) - Nov. 26, 2006, 11:51:29 PM EST

Gah - my bad - (tuberculosis) - Nov. 27, 2006, 12:27:44 AM EST

Also, I just thought about your file size - (crazy) - Nov. 26, 2006, 06:06:09 PM EST

On a 32 bit machine? -NT - (tuberculosis) - (10) - Nov. 26, 2006, 10:52:50 PM EST

Ever heard of PAE? - (folkert) - (9) - Nov. 26, 2006, 10:56:33 PM EST

I'd call that exotic technology -NT - (tuberculosis) - (8) - Nov. 26, 2006, 11:11:49 PM EST

No, it is bone stock on everything since the P3 from Intel - (folkert) - (7) - Nov. 27, 2006, 02:18:48 PM EST

And AMD? PowerPC? ARM? - (tuberculosis) - (6) - Nov. 27, 2006, 02:30:16 PM EST

You said COMMON 32-bit - (folkert) - (5) - Nov. 27, 2006, 02:35:31 PM EST

That kind of weasel won't get you a job - (tuberculosis) - (4) - Nov. 27, 2006, 02:35:03 PM EST

This line of questioning wouldn't get you a candidate for - (folkert) - (3) - Nov. 27, 2006, 02:36:54 PM EST

Whoa - (crazy) - (2) - Nov. 27, 2006, 02:43:30 PM EST

No he got downright rude. -NT - (folkert) - (1) - Nov. 27, 2006, 02:47:43 PM EST

I'm not trying to be rude - (tuberculosis) - Nov. 27, 2006, 03:48:04 PM EST

Where did you get 1G? - (tuberculosis) - (2) - Nov. 26, 2006, 10:50:05 PM EST

Not all 9 digit numbers are valid. - (Another Scott) - (1) - Nov. 26, 2006, 11:08:48 PM EST

I assumed so - (tuberculosis) - Nov. 26, 2006, 11:15:44 PM EST

something you forgot, what lawyer to hire - (boxley) - (1) - Nov. 26, 2006, 05:40:12 PM EST

Nah - (crazy) - Nov. 26, 2006, 05:51:36 PM EST

We talked about this one before - (admin) - (6) - Nov. 26, 2006, 10:14:49 PM EST

We did - he didn't - (tuberculosis) - (5) - Nov. 26, 2006, 11:06:33 PM EST

Just saying... - (admin) - (4) - Nov. 26, 2006, 11:14:33 PM EST

But we hardly talk about programming at all anymore - (tuberculosis) - (3) - Nov. 26, 2006, 11:18:18 PM EST

:-) - (Another Scott) - (2) - Nov. 26, 2006, 11:42:56 PM EST

I agree on the eyeballs. - (static) - Nov. 26, 2006, 11:59:12 PM EST

I put most of my programming rants on my blog - (tuberculosis) - Nov. 27, 2006, 12:26:11 AM EST

non programmer answer, append a 0,1 or2 - (boxley) - (15) - Nov. 27, 2006, 05:45:45 PM EST

PICK?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!? - (crazy) - (5) - Nov. 27, 2006, 06:40:21 PM EST

dont knock it until you have tried it, recently -NT - (boxley) - (4) - Nov. 27, 2006, 07:58:22 PM EST

I've spent the last 20 years systematically killing it - (crazy) - (3) - Nov. 27, 2006, 09:06:38 PM EST

again, see what the needs are and then ask what the solution - (boxley) - (2) - Nov. 27, 2006, 10:58:55 PM EST

One trick pony - (crazy) - (1) - Nov. 27, 2006, 11:06:48 PM EST

If that is the trick you need use it -NT - (boxley) - Nov. 28, 2006, 06:59:22 AM EST

The key is to stay off the disk - (tuberculosis) - (8) - Nov. 27, 2006, 06:44:04 PM EST

CramFS in RAM. -NT - (folkert) - (6) - Nov. 27, 2006, 07:27:32 PM EST

That's not a solution either - (tuberculosis) - (5) - Nov. 27, 2006, 08:14:50 PM EST

Okay, at this point... - (folkert) - (4) - Nov. 27, 2006, 09:45:49 PM EST

Sure - just want to give you a taste - (tuberculosis) - (3) - Nov. 27, 2006, 10:58:48 PM EST

personally I hate programming, I like debugging - (boxley) - Nov. 27, 2006, 11:05:54 PM EST

Cheaper at Bookpool, btw. - (admin) - Nov. 27, 2006, 11:15:28 PM EST

ICLRPD - (drewk) - Nov. 27, 2006, 11:39:45 PM EST

Math isnt my strong suit but - (boxley) - Nov. 27, 2006, 08:25:07 PM EST

I hope you're going to outline the solution. :-) - (Another Scott) - (3) - Nov. 27, 2006, 09:33:15 PM EST

Admin did it very nicely. - (crazy) - (1) - Nov. 27, 2006, 09:49:53 PM EST

D'Oh! Thanks. -NT - (Another Scott) - Nov. 27, 2006, 09:58:57 PM EST

Cool sort paper - (crazy) - Nov. 27, 2006, 09:55:50 PM EST

Taking a stab - (ChrisR) - (2) - Nov. 27, 2006, 10:07:24 PM EST

Still doesn't beat O(1) :-) -NT - (admin) - (1) - Nov. 27, 2006, 10:13:27 PM EST

Ok, I read the answer you gave... - (ChrisR) - Nov. 27, 2006, 10:19:51 PM EST

iwethey.org

I'm gonna break him like a wedding vow on the Jerry Springer Show.
128 ms