Opposite is true I think

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #273,780 by tuberculosis 11/23/06 1:21:18 PM Reply	Opposite is true I think if you don't need a library, the language is too complex. Languages should be tiny and simple. [link\|http://www.blackbagops.net\|Black Bag Operations Log] [link\|http://www.objectiveclips.com\|Artificial Intelligence] [link\|http://www.badpage.info/seaside/html\|Scrutinizer]
Post #273,781 by ChrisR 11/23/06 2:21:12 PM Reply	A good programming language... ...should blur the distinctions between built-in functions, standard libraries and added on libraries.
Post #273,802 by tuberculosis 11/23/06 7:44:55 PM Reply	Yep and the ones that are written in themselves lend themselves most to this. [link\|http://www.blackbagops.net\|Black Bag Operations Log] [link\|http://www.objectiveclips.com\|Artificial Intelligence] [link\|http://www.badpage.info/seaside/html\|Scrutinizer]

Heh - (tuberculosis) - (6) - Aug. 21, 2007, 06:21:42 AM EDT

Reminds me of Greencodd's Law - (tablizer) - (1) - Nov. 23, 2006, 03:36:50 AM EST

One of the Wiki comments sums it up for me - (drewk) - Nov. 23, 2006, 11:10:53 AM EST

if you need a library the dam language is too complex -NT - (boxley) - (3) - Nov. 23, 2006, 11:42:43 AM EST

Opposite is true I think - (tuberculosis) - (2) - Nov. 23, 2006, 01:21:18 PM EST

A good programming language... - (ChrisR) - (1) - Nov. 23, 2006, 02:21:12 PM EST

Yep - (tuberculosis) - Nov. 23, 2006, 07:44:55 PM EST

Battling CRC is the honor of Viking combat!
47 ms