IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Jobs Forum / What about non-random wackos?
Post #272,043
by pwhysall
Picture of pwhysall
11/3/06 11:35:25 AM
Reply
New What about non-random wackos?

Peter
[link|http://www.no2id.net/|Don't Let The Terrorists Win]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Home]
Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
[link|http://kevan.org/brain.cgi?pwhysall|A better terminal emulator]
Post #272,048
by Yendor
11/3/06 11:57:46 AM
Reply
New The only non-random whacko to call me just to bug me...
...had an international number, and was calling on or about July 1, 2005.

As I recall, that conversation produced a few LRPDs.
-YendorMike

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
- Benjamin Franklin, 1759 Historical Review of Pennsylvania
     IGNORE. Nothing to see, move along. -NT - (folkert) - (27) - Nov. 3, 2006, 01:15:09 PM EST
         Looks good, but - (hnick) - (5) - Nov. 3, 2006, 11:19:33 AM EST
             Why? - (Yendor) - (4) - Nov. 3, 2006, 11:28:16 AM EST
                 What about non-random wackos? -NT - (pwhysall) - (1) - Nov. 3, 2006, 11:35:25 AM EST
                     The only non-random whacko to call me just to bug me... - (Yendor) - Nov. 3, 2006, 11:57:46 AM EST
                 Shunned by random whackos? -NT - (ChrisR) - Nov. 3, 2006, 11:36:32 AM EST
                 Kneejerk paranoia, mostly. - (hnick) - Nov. 3, 2006, 11:43:28 AM EST
         You mean CV -NT - (tuberculosis) - Aug. 21, 2007, 06:24:59 AM EDT
         suggest references supplied upon request - (boxley) - (17) - Nov. 3, 2006, 11:38:50 AM EST
             Agreed with that - (Yendor) - (9) - Nov. 3, 2006, 11:58:43 AM EST
                 Again, they are demanding these things now. - (folkert) - (8) - Nov. 3, 2006, 12:38:25 PM EST
                     Re: Again, they are demanding these things now. - (Yendor) - (3) - Nov. 3, 2006, 01:07:20 PM EST
                         Nope. a yahoo address is not acceptable. - (folkert) - (2) - Nov. 3, 2006, 01:14:05 PM EST
                             Sez who? That's where all my work-related emails go. -NT - (Yendor) - Nov. 3, 2006, 01:13:16 PM EST
                             Second reply, after your edit - (Yendor) - Nov. 3, 2006, 01:24:09 PM EST
                     Er, ack... - (admin) - (3) - Nov. 3, 2006, 01:12:27 PM EST
                         It is un-published now. -NT - (folkert) - (2) - Nov. 3, 2006, 01:14:30 PM EST
                             Thanks, but... - (admin) - Nov. 3, 2006, 01:51:43 PM EST
                             I don't think that was the point. -NT - (bepatient) - Nov. 3, 2006, 01:57:00 PM EST
             References are - (folkert) - (6) - Nov. 3, 2006, 12:37:32 PM EST
                 I keep my references separate - (ChrisR) - (4) - Nov. 3, 2006, 12:42:32 PM EST
                     Again, you cause another task for recruiters. - (folkert) - (3) - Nov. 3, 2006, 12:45:57 PM EST
                         are the recruiters getting you interviews? - (boxley) - (2) - Nov. 3, 2006, 12:55:22 PM EST
                             and feel free to use me if you need to -NT - (boxley) - Nov. 3, 2006, 12:55:47 PM EST
                             They are doing better than anything else. - (folkert) - Nov. 3, 2006, 01:07:15 PM EST
                 Agree they are required - (bepatient) - Nov. 3, 2006, 01:03:55 PM EST
         You realize, by telling everyone to IGNORE, - (bionerd) - (1) - Nov. 3, 2006, 02:56:04 PM EST
             Not the point in any case -NT - (folkert) - Nov. 3, 2006, 05:12:02 PM EST

narfdorglak
74 ms