IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New I'm smarter than I look ;)
I forgot to mention that 192.168.0.35 is my own NIC's. IP.

But I hacked/fixed by adding the same bogus route again, but with a cost of 20, then added the same route, but sent it to the route with cost 1.

Ugly. Anyone have a better idea?
That's her, officer! That's the woman that programmed me for evil!
New can you not modify the 35 to 10 ?
Our bureaucracy and our laws have turned the world into a clean, safe work camp. We are raising a nation of slaves.
Chuck Palahniuk
New ? You mean change my own IP from .35 to .10?
What would that do?

I can only assume my NIC (or Windows) is trying to be smarter than I am, since I always have *unremovable* routes of 192.0.0.0 and 224.0.0.0 added. Haven't played enough to know if this is normal behavior or not:

C:\\WINDOWS>route print

Active Routes:

Network Address Netmask Gateway Address Interface Metric
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.110 192.168.0.35 1
127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1
192.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 192.168.0.35 192.168.0.35 1
192.168.0.35 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1
192.168.0.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.35 192.168.0.35 1
224.0.0.0 224.0.0.0 192.168.0.35 192.168.0.35 1
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.35 192.168.0.35 1



The .35 is me. But the issue is, I need 192.0.0.0 to go out the router, and only mask 192.168.0.255 for inbound (i.e. - we're only using those 254 addresses on the LAN). I must be missing something...
That's her, officer! That's the woman that programmed me for evil!
New it means I must be slow here
you entire network 192.0.0.0 is going to you. Shouldnt it read that 192.0.0.0(entire 192 network) should be forwarded to the router? Yer second 192.168.0.255 is redundant you have already set that route. The 224 route is something I have seen ms doing lately but am not enlightened on the cause. Get rid of the 255. route. Try it out and let me know.
thanx,
bill
Our bureaucracy and our laws have turned the world into a clean, safe work camp. We are raising a nation of slaves.
Chuck Palahniuk
New Can't get rid of the .255 route
'cause if those packets hit the router, they're not coming back to the correct hosts inside the LAN. But it's moot anyway:
Active Routes:

Network Address Netmask Gateway Address Interface Metric
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.110 192.168.0.35 1
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.111 192.168.0.35 1
127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1
192.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 192.168.0.35 192.168.0.35 1
192.168.0.35 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1
192.168.0.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.35 192.168.0.35 1
224.0.0.0 224.0.0.0 192.168.0.35 192.168.0.35 1
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.35 192.168.0.35 1

C:\\WINDOWS>route delete 192.168.0.255
The route specified was not found.

C:\\WINDOWS>route delete 192.0.0.0
The route specified was not found.

C:\\WINDOWS>


I can only stand so much more Windows... <:( Thanks for the try, though.
That's her, officer! That's the woman that programmed me for evil!
     Can *anybody* reach cert.org? - (tseliot) - (9)
         No problem here! -NT - (jlalexander)
         Okay, I think I know why not, but how do I fix? - (tseliot) - (7)
             I'm smarter than I look ;) - (tseliot) - (4)
                 can you not modify the 35 to 10 ? -NT - (boxley) - (3)
                     ? You mean change my own IP from .35 to .10? - (tseliot) - (2)
                         it means I must be slow here - (boxley) - (1)
                             Can't get rid of the .255 route - (tseliot)
             Keep It Simple, Stupid - (ronelson) - (1)
                 Not my idea. :( - (tseliot)

They had me at, “Get the Hot Wheels Rally Case!”
55 ms