IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Science says colonialism benefits the colonized
[link|http://www.slate.com/id/2151852/|Here comes the science!]

Excerpts:

The reason it's hard to resolve this question is that we have no controlled experiments comparing otherwise similar places with different sets of legal and economic institutions. In new research, James Feyrer and Bruce Sacerdote, both of Dartmouth College, consider the effect of a particular aspect of history?the length of European colonization?on the current standard of living of a group of 80 tiny, isolated islands that have not previously been used in cross-country comparisons. Their question: Are the islands that experienced European colonization for a longer period of time richer today?

...Feyrer and Sacedote's key findings are that the longer one of the islands spent as a colony, the higher its present-day living standards and the lower its infant mortality rate. Each additional century of European colonization is associated with a 40 percent boost in income today and a reduction in infant mortality of 2.6 deaths per 1,000 births.

By itself, the relationship between longer colonization and higher living standards could arise either because European contact raised living standards or because European explorers colonized the most promising islands first. The authors cleverly reject the latter possibility by noting that the sailing of the day relied on wind, which meant that islands located where wind is weak were "less likely to be discovered, revisited, and colonized by Europeans."

...The authors also compare the experiences of separate Pacific islands with eight different colonizers: the United States, Britain, Spain, Denmark, Portugal, Japan, Germany, and France. Their verdict is that the islands that are best off, in terms of income growth, are the ones that were colonized by the United States?as in Guam and Puerto Rico. Next best is time spent as a Dutch, British, or French colony. At the bottom are the countries colonized by the Spanish and especially the Portuguese.


[link|http://www.angelfire.com/ca3/marlowe/politics.world.html#20061021|Angelfire link] (turn off Javascript to avoid popups)

[link|http://fnmarlowe-politics-world.blogspot.com/2006/10/science-says-colonialism-benefits.html|Comment at blogger.com]

----------------------------------------------------------------
4 out of 5 Iraqis choose democracy!
If you don't like my posts, don't click on them.
Never mind the AP. Here's the real Iraq reporting: [link|http://michaelyon.blogspot.com/|http://michaelyon.blogspot.com/]
"The period of debate is closed. Arms, as the last resort, decide the contest." - Thomas Paine, Common Sense
New s /Science/2 Economists/
New Depends on who you ask.
Ask the natives that got plowed under to fertilize the fields and they may not have found a lot of benefit.
[link|http://www.aaxnet.com|AAx]
New Colonization pathogen virulence decreases over time
Not unlike AIDS.
New And slavery benefits the enslaved
same argument really.



[link|http://www.blackbagops.net|Black Bag Operations Log]

[link|http://www.objectiveclips.com|Artificial Intelligence]

[link|http://www.badpage.info/seaside/html|Scrutinizer]
Expand Edited by tuberculosis Aug. 21, 2007, 06:04:32 AM EDT
     Science says colonialism benefits the colonized - (marlowe) - (4)
         s /Science/2 Economists/ -NT - (Another Scott)
         Depends on who you ask. - (Andrew Grygus)
         Colonization pathogen virulence decreases over time - (GBert)
         And slavery benefits the enslaved - (tuberculosis)

Walk like an Egyptian.
40 ms