I thot it was s'posed to be the gigglecache on the haverproc

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #267,951

by jake123

9/18/06 12:36:37 PM

I thot it was s'posed to be the gigglecache on the haverproc

or maybe it was the hemoselect?

--\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton                            jake at consultron.ca *\n* [link|http://consultron.ca|http://consultron.ca]                   [link|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] *\n* Kingston Ontario Canada               [link|news://news.consultron.ca|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------

Temp tables in Postgresql. - (mmoffitt) - (3) - Sept. 12, 2006, 02:04:10 PM EDT

Can't you specify nocache on the sproc? -NT - (drewk) - (2) - Sept. 12, 2006, 02:44:26 PM EDT

Thanks, Drew. - (mmoffitt) - (1) - Sept. 18, 2006, 11:46:47 AM EDT

I thot it was s'posed to be the gigglecache on the haverproc - (jake123) - Sept. 18, 2006, 12:36:37 PM EDT

iwethey.org

It looks like someone sewed pieces of a waterlogged Reagan mask together at gunpoint.
29 ms