IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Internally developed?
Hunt down and fire the perp.



[link|http://www.blackbagops.net|Black Bag Operations Log]

[link|http://www.objectiveclips.com|Artificial Intelligence]

[link|http://www.badpage.info/seaside/html|Scrutinizer]
New Kind of tough
He's my new boss and directs my day by day activities.
He's also the new systems designer now that I've been judged incompetent.

Note: I've been reading "Data Structures with STL".
[link|http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0130289272?v=glance|http://www.amazon.co...30289272?v=glance]

Decent book. Some stupid typoes, wordos (love it when someone adds a mispelled word to the spellcheck software), and typset-softwaros though.

Done a bunch of examples, and am getting a bit more comfortable with C++.

While the Perl->C drop in productivity would be about 100 to 1, Perl->C++/STL will be about 20 to 1.
New He's definitely not qualified
Hope you're not paying him too much.




[link|http://www.blackbagops.net|Black Bag Operations Log]

[link|http://www.objectiveclips.com|Artificial Intelligence]

[link|http://www.badpage.info/seaside/html|Scrutinizer]
New C++ with STL isn't bad
but can be VERY wordy....and const can drive you crazy.

There are 2 other books, I'd recommend
[link|http://www.amazon.com/C%2b%2b-Standard-Library-Tutorial-Reference/dp/0201379260/sr=1-1/qid=1158270515/ref=pd_bbs_1/102-4268238-1448904?ie=UTF8&s=books|http://www.amazon.co...4?ie=UTF8&s=books]
and [link|http://www.amazon.com/STL-Tutorial-Reference-Guide-Programming/dp/0201379236/sr=1-3/qid=1158270515/ref=pd_bbs_3/102-4268238-1448904?ie=UTF8&s=books|http://www.amazon.co...4?ie=UTF8&s=books]

But, C++ with STL allows most of the data constructs that PERL allows (just not the RE and modules. <sigh>)
New No it doesn't
But, C++ with STL allows most of the data constructs that PERL allows (just not the RE and modules. <sigh>)


Or if it did, it is so damn picky and wordy and painful to get from point A to point B it is just not worth it.

Note: Boost libs have REGEXP but it pretty much sucks. At least a dozen lines of error prone C++ code for every line of Perl code.

<sigh back>

Ahh, screw it. I'll do the best I can until something better comes along.
New STL is insane.
What a POS. Picky, wordy, finicky... everything you don't want in a library that's supposed to make things easier to do.
Regards,

-scott anderson

"Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
New I am rather amused
at how the C++ world has latched onto extensive use of templates to get a primitive form of duck typing - even though they insist that duck typing is dangerous and error prone.




[link|http://www.blackbagops.net|Black Bag Operations Log]

[link|http://www.objectiveclips.com|Artificial Intelligence]

[link|http://www.badpage.info/seaside/html|Scrutinizer]
New Too bad it doesn't die like a duck...
Regards,

-scott anderson

"Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
New You know they don't echo?
===

Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link|http://DocHope.com|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats].
[link|http://DocHope.com|http://DocHope.com]
New C++ regex SUCKS!!!!!!
[link|http://www.boost.org/libs/regex/doc/|http://www.boost.org/libs/regex/doc/]
     I have stared at the gates of hell. - (broomberg) - (34)
         Huge nested case statements? -NT - (hnick) - (2)
             Nope - (broomberg) - (1)
                 Oh.... - (hnick)
         The Winnah! - (jb4)
         Internally developed? - (tuberculosis) - (9)
             Kind of tough - (broomberg) - (8)
                 He's definitely not qualified - (tuberculosis)
                 C++ with STL isn't bad - (Simon_Jester) - (6)
                     No it doesn't - (broomberg)
                     STL is insane. - (admin) - (4)
                         I am rather amused - (tuberculosis) - (2)
                             Too bad it doesn't die like a duck... -NT - (admin) - (1)
                                 You know they don't echo? -NT - (drewk)
                         C++ regex SUCKS!!!!!! - (broomberg)
         2^14 lines exactly? - (pwhysall) - (2)
             yup - (broomberg) - (1)
                 I don't think there is a maximum defined - (pwhysall)
         I make do with staring at Windows. That's hell enough :) -NT - (Meerkat)
         Was that including comments? -NT - (static) - (8)
             Yes - (broomberg) - (7)
                 He probably was. - (static)
                 Buy him the refactoring book -NT - (tuberculosis) - (5)
                     Nope - (broomberg) - (4)
                         Have it surreptitiously show up on his desk one day -NT - (jb4) - (3)
                             Nope - (broomberg) - (2)
                                 Bum. Mer. -NT - (jb4)
                                 Read it in front of him -NT - (tuberculosis)
         You saw Barb bend over again? -NT - (imqwerky) - (6)
             Huh? -NT - (broomberg) - (5)
                 Wait for it! Wait for it.... -NT - (imqwerky) - (4)
                     Still waiting... -NT - (jb4) - (3)
                         Well, if I hafta explain, it's not going to be funny - (imqwerky) - (2)
                             While in that corner... - (jb4)
                             *Snicker* I thought it was pretty funny. -NT - (bionerd)

Unfortunately, with great ambition comes great shit hitting the fan.
74 ms