C++ question on const - (ChrisR) - (24) - Aug. 14, 2006, 10:10:50 AM EDT
         Don't change the object, I believe - (JayMehaffey) - (2) - Aug. 14, 2006, 11:05:16 AM EDT
             Doh. - (ChrisR) - (1) - Aug. 15, 2006, 12:27:00 PM EDT
                 More than that... - (jb4) - Aug. 15, 2006, 04:05:02 PM EDT
         Re: C++ question on const - (tuberculosis) - (20) - Aug. 14, 2006, 11:22:39 PM EDT
             I still don't understand... - (ChrisR) - (19) - Aug. 15, 2006, 10:59:52 AM EDT
                 Const is not always forced - (JayMehaffey) - Aug. 15, 2006, 11:23:16 AM EDT
                 Its counterintuitive - (tuberculosis) - (14) - Aug. 15, 2006, 01:03:04 PM EDT
                     Say WHAT?!? - (jb4) - (13) - Aug. 15, 2006, 04:30:02 PM EDT
                         You can overload on const - (tuberculosis) - (11) - Aug. 15, 2006, 04:47:41 PM EDT
                             Why the hell would it do / allow that? - (drewk) - (1) - Aug. 15, 2006, 04:45:34 PM EDT
                                 Bell labs has an unlimited crack budget - (tuberculosis) - Aug. 15, 2006, 04:57:05 PM EDT
                             The easiness to keep track of is not the issue - (jb4) - (8) - Aug. 15, 2006, 05:49:16 PM EDT
                                 Huh? - (tuberculosis) - (7) - Aug. 15, 2006, 06:51:19 PM EDT
                                     No... - (jb4) - (6) - Aug. 16, 2006, 10:12:37 AM EDT
                                         I think you're talking past each other... - (admin) - Aug. 16, 2006, 11:11:53 AM EDT
                                         And you specify that by.... - (tuberculosis) - (4) - Aug. 16, 2006, 11:48:14 AM EDT
                                             We'll leave it at that. - (jb4) - (3) - Aug. 16, 2006, 12:32:21 PM EDT
                                                 I wasn't trying to be sarcastic - (tuberculosis) - (2) - Aug. 16, 2006, 01:27:58 PM EDT
                                                     No need to specify OO in this case - (JayMehaffey) - Aug. 16, 2006, 01:35:32 PM EDT
                                                     What does the type of the reference have to do with anything - (jb4) - Aug. 16, 2006, 03:06:42 PM EDT
                         Nominating this for LRPD (new thread) - (lincoln) - Aug. 18, 2006, 03:18:45 PM EDT
                 Re: I still don't understand... - (jb4) - (2) - Aug. 15, 2006, 04:16:40 PM EDT
                     Which brings up another question. - (ChrisR) - (1) - Aug. 15, 2006, 08:25:15 PM EDT
                         Pure virtual functions - (tuberculosis) - Aug. 15, 2006, 09:01:04 PM EDT