Are you blind deaf and dumb?

Post #262,125 by bluke 7/19/06 6:02:51 AM Reply	Are you blind deaf and dumb? tell that to the 8 railroad workers killed by a rocket falling on the garage. Tell that to the women killed by a rocket sitting on her balcony drinking coffee, etc. There are at least 25 civilians dead as a result of rocket attacks and many many more wounded.
Post #262,151 by jake123 7/19/06 10:24:10 AM Reply	How many civilians has Israel killed in the last fifty years vs how many they've lost? Oh yeah, that's right, Israel doesn't think of most of them as civilians. In fact, I kinda wonder whether or not they think of them as underhumans. From a lot of the stuff I've heard emanating out of the mouths of a lot of Israelis that I've seen on TV, it's pretty clear that a pretty big chunk of them do, though the Israeli government is pretty good at the mealy-mouthed euphemistic marketing speak so as not to actually come out and say it. For an example of the kind of thing I mean, see my response to your other post. --\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton jake at consultron.ca \n [link\|http://consultron.ca\|http://consultron.ca] [link\|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca\|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] \n Kingston Ontario Canada [link\|news://news.consultron.ca\|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------
Post #262,153 by boxley 7/19/06 10:35:00 AM Reply	how many civilians has Canada killed in the last 50 years vs how many they've lost? Oh yeah, that's right, Canada doesn't think of most of them as civilians. In fact, I kinda wonder whether or not they think of them as underhumans. From a lot of the stuff I've heard emanating out of the mouths of a lot of Canadians that I've seen on TV, it's pretty clear that a pretty big chunk of them do, though the Canadian government is pretty good at the mealy-mouthed euphemistic marketing speak so as not to actually come out and say it. what a nice fit to the troubles on the reservations. thanx, bill Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 50 years. meep
Post #262,158 by jake123 7/19/06 11:29:36 AM Reply	Nice red herring box and you already know my position on that part of Canada's history too. 'nuff said. --\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton jake at consultron.ca \n [link\|http://consultron.ca\|http://consultron.ca] [link\|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca\|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] \n Kingston Ontario Canada [link\|news://news.consultron.ca\|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------
Post #262,161 by boxley 7/19/06 12:14:10 PM Reply	April 28th 2006 is HISTORY? WTF [link\|http://auto_sol.tao.ca/node/view/2041\|http://auto_sol.tao.ca/node/view/2041] thanx, bill Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 50 years. meep
Post #262,181 by jake123 7/19/06 2:07:49 PM 7/19/06 2:09:23 PM Reply	Not resolving here You talking about Caledonia? And what does that have to do with how Israel is doing to Lebanon? It's still a red herring Box. --\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton jake at consultron.ca \n [link\|http://consultron.ca\|http://consultron.ca] [link\|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca\|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] \n Kingston Ontario Canada [link\|news://news.consultron.ca\|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n------------------------------------------------------------------- Edited by jake123 July 19, 2006, 02:09:23 PM EDT Expand All History
Post #262,265 by bluke 7/20/06 3:19:46 AM Reply	What does that have to do with anything? Basically what you are saying is that more Lebanese/Palestinians have died than Israelis and therefore Israel is guilty. This bizarre calculus implies that if only more Israelis had been killed by Hezbollah rockets, there would be no moral quandary. While proportionality may be a relevant measure in some situations \ufffd baseball statistics and model cars come to mind \ufffd the appropriateness of Israel\ufffds response to the Hezbollah attacks should not be measured by the number of people who are killed in Lebanon. This argument distorts the real question. The Arab world has little regard for the value of life. Are you including the suicide bombers in the equation? What about the "militants" who fire from the houses or crowds of civilians? In addition, Israel should not be punished for having invested in bomb shelters and early-warning systems. These have cost the Israeli public dearly over the years. The question is whether the goals of the military action are justified. The goals of the present conflict are for Hezbollah to shoot as many rockets as possible into populated city centers to kill as many civilians as possible; and for Israel to uproot the terrorist infrastructure, missile launching pads and the terrorists themselves by using intelligence gathering and precise bombing. Rather than seeking "an eye for an eye" or retribution, Israel is seeking to eliminate the threat of future attacks on its cities. This response will be successful not if it is proportional, but if it results in the elimination of this threat. In December 1941, would anyone have suggested that the United States\ufffd response was appropriately "proportional" and complete after the first 2,400 Japanese had been killed? How many German and Japanes civilians died in WWII compared to American civilians?
Post #262,274 by Another Scott 7/20/06 7:50:29 AM Reply	You severely underestimate Hezbollah's goals. The question is whether the goals of the military action are justified. The goals of the present conflict are for Hezbollah to shoot as many rockets as possible into populated city centers to kill as many civilians as possible; and for Israel to uproot the terrorist infrastructure, missile launching pads and the terrorists themselves by using intelligence gathering and precise bombing. Hezbollah's goals aren't to kill as many civilians as possible. In thinking so, you're painting yourself into a corner. Hezbollah has several goals in the present conflict: 1) Force Israel to negotiate the [link\|http://www.voanews.com/english/2006-07-17-voa15.cfm\|release of prisoners]. Their public posture is that Israel has refused to negotiate the release of Lebanese prisoners, so they "have no choice". 2) Steal some of the press attention back from Hamaas. 3) Open a 2nd front on Israel. 4) Take pressure off Iran about its nuclear activities, and force the US to directly negotiate with Iran. 5) Demonstrate that the US must deal with Syria for there to be any stability around Israel. 6) Goad Israel into over-reacting to strengthen Hezbollah's position with the Lebanese Shia population, and thus in Lebanon, while simultaneously causing international opinion to again turn against Israel. If Israel attacks severely, it shows that Hezbollah needs arms to defend Lebanon. If they don't, it shows that Nasrallah is a great leader who can stand up to Israel. Either way, Nasrallah wins. If you only see Hezbollah as a group of bloodthirsty terrorists who want to murder Israelis, then you'll never choose to act in ways that further Israel's long-term interests. Separate the goals from the tactics. You've got to understand their goals even while you condemn their tactics and even while you argue against them achieving their goals. Few disagree that Israel has the right to kill those people who are attacking it, and everyone understands that Hezbollah is operating from civilian areas. Few are arguing that if Hezbollah sends 10 missiles into Haifa, then Israel should only send 10 missiles back. That's not what people mean when they talk about proportional response. The problem is that Israel seems to feel that dropping leaflets and saying "we're sorry, but it's their fault" when Lebanese (or [link\|http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/story.html?id=6d361bec-134b-4993-99ca-5addb300c450\|Canadians] are killed or, when [link\|http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20060720.MIDEASTLLEBAN20/TPStory/TPInternational/Africa/\| a UN compound is shelled] is sufficient. It's not. Many of us recognize that Israel is in a bad situation, but only Israel chooses the targets that it attacks. Saying that Israel is only attacking Hezbollah or "strategic" targets just excuses every mistake on the IDF's part. Bombing highway bridges and airports isn't going to stop rockets from hitting Haifa. It punishes civilians - the people that must ultimately be on your side for there to be peace - while doing nothing to affect the capabilities of the small bands who are firing the rockets. Flattening southern Lebanon isn't going to get rid of Hezbollah nor get Israel back its soldiers. Israel needs to adjust its tactics and recognize that the IDF and IAF aren't the be-all and end-all of its future security. It can no-longer expect peace simply by defeating an enemy. It's not 1967. What happened to the IDF of [link\|http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/july/4/newsid_2786000/2786967.stm\|Entebbe]? Cheers, Scott.
Post #262,277 by bluke 7/20/06 8:32:43 AM Reply	You are right about Hezbollah goals Many in Israel are still scarred from the last time Israel sent ground trips into Lebanon (1982), just like the US for many years was scarred by Vietnam. This means that Israel is very reluctant to commit ground troops. Therefore, the reliance on air power. The problem with what you are suggesting is that the international community has consistently dissapointed Israel. In 1967 U Thant pulled out the UN troops in the Sinai paving the way to the 6 day war, a few years ago, UN troops in Lebanon stood by and watched as Hezbollah kidnapped 3 Israeli soldiers. Relying on anyone else to guarantee Israel's security is a very dangerous and losing proposition.
Post #262,267 by bluke 7/20/06 3:37:40 AM Reply	Proportion and number of civilian deaths [link\|http://www.opinionjournal.com/best/?id=110008675\|Keeping Things in Proportion] What's more, if this report from [link\|http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3278026,00.html\|YnetNews.com] is correct, Hezbollah is trying to maximize Lebanese civilian deaths, presumably for its own propaganda purposes: The IDF [Israel Defense Forces] has found that Hizbullah is preventing civilians from leaving villages in southern Lebanon. Roadblocks have been set up outside some of the villages to prevent residents from leaving, while in other villages Hizbullah is preventing UN representatives from entering, who are trying to help residents leave. In two villages, exchanges of fire between residents and Hizbullah have broken out. As hard as it may be for people brought up in the West to understand this, the value of life in the Arab world is just not the same as in the West.

Welcome to IWETHEY!