ACLs versus UNIX User:Group security? - (inthane-chan) - (14) - May 4, 2006, 04:48:59 PM EDT
         if you mean access lists (ACL) you need both - (boxley) - May 4, 2006, 06:28:36 PM EDT
         Remember, complex does not mean secure - (ben_tilly) - (9) - May 4, 2006, 07:11:27 PM EDT
             Besides which, I am under the impression - (jake123) - (3) - May 4, 2006, 09:46:47 PM EDT
                 My impression contradicts that -NT - (ben_tilly) - May 5, 2006, 02:23:11 AM EDT
                 Nah. - (pwhysall) - (1) - May 5, 2006, 02:47:08 AM EDT
                     Bolt-on? How so? - (folkert) - May 5, 2006, 09:46:35 AM EDT
             On "real security weenies"... - (inthane-chan) - (4) - May 5, 2006, 10:56:58 AM EDT
                 But some are better than others - (ben_tilly) - (3) - May 5, 2006, 11:11:08 AM EDT
                     Awooga! Pedant alert! - (pwhysall) - May 6, 2006, 05:10:47 AM EDT
                     except for the giant gapers in it, ask skip offline -NT - (boxley) - (1) - May 6, 2006, 10:49:59 AM EDT
                         Will do but... - (ben_tilly) - May 8, 2006, 11:18:55 AM EDT
         Linux has both. - (broomberg) - May 4, 2006, 10:16:06 PM EDT
         UNIX has ACLs. - (pwhysall) - (1) - May 5, 2006, 01:58:36 AM EDT
             see my "Bolt on? How so?" post. -NT - (folkert) - May 5, 2006, 09:47:57 AM EDT