IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New if it supports WinAPIs then Windows Office would run
Of course, after experiencing Microsoft tweeking Win32s.dll to break Win-OS/2 compatibility, I wouldn't trust Windows Office to run for long using WinAPIs on the Mac.
Darrell Spice, Jr.            Trendy yet complex\nPeople seek me out - though they're not sure why\n[link|http://spiceware.org/gallery/ArtisticOverpass|Artistic Overpass]                      [link|http://www.spiceware.org/|SpiceWare]
New "Not for long" is right
All it takes is one service pack with associated Office updates to change a ubiquitous API in a trivial but annoying way. Like say a change to the File Open dialog used by Office apps. Release a version that depends on a new API and Office for OSX is instantly sunsetted/legacy.
===

Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link|http://DocHope.com|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats].
[link|http://DocHope.com|http://DocHope.com]
New And that API change already exists - require .NET.
New Yup.
"It's a Critical Security Update. We can't help it that it breaks applications that aren't running on our OS. We only test fixes on our OS."

Or some such rot.

Cheers,
Scott.
New Why would you want it?
Office 2004 is much nicer than the Windows version.


Peter
[link|http://www.no2id.net/|Don't Let The Terrorists Win]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Home]
Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
     Cringely says Apple has rights to the WinXP APIs. - (Another Scott) - (5)
         if it supports WinAPIs then Windows Office would run - (SpiceWare) - (4)
             "Not for long" is right - (drewk) - (1)
                 And that API change already exists - require .NET. -NT - (inthane-chan)
             Yup. - (Another Scott)
             Why would you want it? - (pwhysall)

LI_
38 ms