IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Temporarily skip over the qualifying "only slightly less".
Alex

When fascism comes to America, it'll be wrapped in a flag and carrying a cross. -- Sinclair Lewis
New That works, but it's not quite the same.
Unless a comma (or dash) is present somewhere, or unless it ends a sentence, I almost always see a "than" follow a "less" in a sentence. [link|http://www2.ncsu.edu/ncsu/grammar/Pronoun3.html|E.g.]:

No man is an island, entire of itself; every man is a piece of the continent, a part of the main. If a clod be washed away by the sea, Europe is the less, as well as if a promontory were, as well as if a manor of thy friends or of thine own were. Any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind, and therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee.


I find 79,000 hits for "as less as" (in quotes) on Google. In the examples I see, I would be most likely to use "as little as" (37.7 M hits) or "as few as" (4.9 M hits) instead.

Skipping over "only slightly less" dramatically changes the meaning for me. Instead of it being a comparison, it lumps them together. "I regard X as I regard Y." If I couldn't use "than", I would have expressed that as, something like, "I have less regard for X; like I have little regard for Y." In other words, I think the "less" is being used as an implied comparison, not to indicate near equality of regard.

Short subject lines are a bitch.

I'm not saying Peter's wrong. Just that it is an expression I don't recall seeing before. English is neat like that. :-)

Cheers,
Scott.
New Doesn't work; that's the operative part of the sentence.
     Vista will be late. - (Another Scott) - (27)
         s/./r. -NT - (Steve Lowe) - (7)
             That doesn't do what you think it does. :-P -NT - (ben_tilly) - (6)
                 how 'bout s/\\./.r -NT - (jb4) - (5)
                     That was my point, exactly. -NT - (ben_tilly) - (4)
                         K3wl! I lernt linnix! -NT - (jb4) - (3)
                             No... yew lurnt bash escapes and regex -NT - (folkert) - (2)
                                 What do bash escapes have to do with that? -NT - (ben_tilly)
                                 You're right... - (jb4)
         colour me unsurprised - (cforde) - (1)
             Sorry, I've used up that crayon - (drewk)
         Same reaction to this post.. - (bepatient)
         This is a crucial point in MS's corporate lifecycle - (pwhysall) - (2)
             assuredly so - (cforde) - (1)
                 s/Vista/a mere shadow of something resembling Vista/ -NT - (jb4)
         Cringely says it's the big OEM's fault. - (Another Scott) - (12)
             The RTM Date DID Slip - (altmann)
             Cringely is overrated. - (pwhysall) - (10)
                 Did Peter just make a grammar error?!?! -NT - (Another Scott) - (7)
                     No. -NT - (pwhysall) - (6)
                         "X less stupid as Y" is a strange construct to these eyes. -NT - (Another Scott) - (4)
                             Ditto - (Silverlock)
                             Temporarily skip over the qualifying "only slightly less". -NT - (a6l6e6x) - (2)
                                 That works, but it's not quite the same. - (Another Scott)
                                 Doesn't work; that's the operative part of the sentence. -NT - (CRConrad)
                         Yes. -NT - (CRConrad)
                 which cringley, there are several of them -NT - (boxley) - (1)
                     The one on pbs.org -NT - (static)

10 PRINT "HELLO LRPD"
20 GOTO 10

78 ms