IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 1 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New how 'bout s/\\./.r
jb4
"Every Repbulican who wants to defend Bush on [the expansion of Presidential powers], should be forced to say, 'I wouldn't hesitate to see President Hillary Rodham Clinton have the same authority'."
&mdash an unidentified letter writer to Newsweek on the expansion of executive powers under the Bush administration
New That was my point, exactly.
I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother)
New K3wl! I lernt linnix!
jb4
"Every Repbulican who wants to defend Bush on [the expansion of Presidential powers], should be forced to say, 'I wouldn't hesitate to see President Hillary Rodham Clinton have the same authority'."
&mdash an unidentified letter writer to Newsweek on the expansion of executive powers under the Bush administration
New No... yew lurnt bash escapes and regex
--
[link|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net|greg],
[link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ iwethey
Freedom is not FREE.
Yeah, but 10s of Trillions of US Dollars?
SELECT * FROM scog WHERE ethics > 0;

0 rows returned.
New What do bash escapes have to do with that?
I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother)
New You're right...
...you don't do subtle....
jb4
"Every Repbulican who wants to defend Bush on [the expansion of Presidential powers], should be forced to say, 'I wouldn't hesitate to see President Hillary Rodham Clinton have the same authority'."
&mdash an unidentified letter writer to Newsweek on the expansion of executive powers under the Bush administration
     Vista will be late. - (Another Scott) - (27)
         s/./r. -NT - (Steve Lowe) - (7)
             That doesn't do what you think it does. :-P -NT - (ben_tilly) - (6)
                 how 'bout s/\\./.r -NT - (jb4) - (5)
                     That was my point, exactly. -NT - (ben_tilly) - (4)
                         K3wl! I lernt linnix! -NT - (jb4) - (3)
                             No... yew lurnt bash escapes and regex -NT - (folkert) - (2)
                                 What do bash escapes have to do with that? -NT - (ben_tilly)
                                 You're right... - (jb4)
         colour me unsurprised - (cforde) - (1)
             Sorry, I've used up that crayon - (drewk)
         Same reaction to this post.. - (bepatient)
         This is a crucial point in MS's corporate lifecycle - (pwhysall) - (2)
             assuredly so - (cforde) - (1)
                 s/Vista/a mere shadow of something resembling Vista/ -NT - (jb4)
         Cringely says it's the big OEM's fault. - (Another Scott) - (12)
             The RTM Date DID Slip - (altmann)
             Cringely is overrated. - (pwhysall) - (10)
                 Did Peter just make a grammar error?!?! -NT - (Another Scott) - (7)
                     No. -NT - (pwhysall) - (6)
                         "X less stupid as Y" is a strange construct to these eyes. -NT - (Another Scott) - (4)
                             Ditto - (Silverlock)
                             Temporarily skip over the qualifying "only slightly less". -NT - (a6l6e6x) - (2)
                                 That works, but it's not quite the same. - (Another Scott)
                                 Doesn't work; that's the operative part of the sentence. -NT - (CRConrad)
                         Yes. -NT - (CRConrad)
                 which cringley, there are several of them -NT - (boxley) - (1)
                     The one on pbs.org -NT - (static)

I finally caught it when it tried to drink from my used bong and fell in.
82 ms