IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Re: TMF on Enron
The MF is exactly right in that the biggest scandal in the Enron collapse is the complicity of Anderson in Enron's accounting fraud.

But punishment is not likely to change the behavior of auditors, because the incentive structure at the big accounting firms is badly screwed up.

Here's how the system should work. In order to attract outside investment, a company needs (among other things) to be able to convince investors that its financial statements are accurate. An outside auditor is useful in convincing investors of this, to the extent that the auditor is perceived to be honest and independent. Essentially, the auditor is selling their credibility and reputation for trustworthiness. So the company has an incentive to hire a credible auditor (to help it attract capital), and competition means that accounting firms have an incentive to be honest (because they will attract business in proportion to their reputation).

However, in the US there are two points at which this nice model breaks down. First, the big accounting firms make most of their money from management consulting, not from accountancy. So here's the first conflict of interest: when auditing a big firm, the accountancy has an incentive to sweep irregularities under the rug, because the revenue from the consulting can be bigger than potential lost auditing business in the future. Second, there are only a few big accounting firms -- Andersen, Deloitte and Touche, Ernst and Young, KPMG, and PricewaterhouseCoopers. With such a small number of accountancies, its possible for them to cartelize and lower their standards of trustworthiness, since a big firm has no choice but to employ one of them. So in this case it's possible for the accountancies to engage in a "race to the bottom".

To avoid similar scandals in the future, first, what the SEC needs to do is to forbid the accountancies from doing management consulting. And second, the Justice Department needs to use antitrust law to break up the accounting firms so that there's more competition in the market.
New What big 5? Will be the big 4 shortly
My Dreams aren't as empty as my conscience seems to be
New Antitrust not applicable to oligopoly
Unless you can show that the big 5 have heavily colluded, there ain't no way that the antitrust laws, as they currently stand, can be used against oligopolies. It's been tried against big oil, cereal companies, auto companies, etc... and has never been successful.
New Points echoed on NPR just now, Dave Martin -
an econ / business professor added a bit on the weakening of the Financial Accounting Standards Board in the course of vicious fighting / lobbying in Congress recently, over just your points:

The intermixing of auditing and ""consulting"" functions - a proposed amendment would also have forced disclosure of stock options given Acct'g firms' execs yada yada. He described the action then as, "taking a big bag of coins and walking the halls of congress, dropping them in slots.."

All quashed: Phil Gramm (he of the Enron-wife) proposed a compromise bill which - natch preserved all the perks / did nothing. 'Course ol Phil retired.. just about the time E was heading for the toilet.

Oh well, Civics 101 and Econ were fiction courses, right? It's actually a Billy n'Bally world but ssshhh!


A.
     TMF on Enron - (Another Scott) - (5)
         Indeed, one would have to be Pollyanna - (Ashton)
         Re: TMF on Enron - (neelk) - (3)
             What big 5? Will be the big 4 shortly -NT - (boxley)
             Antitrust not applicable to oligopoly - (ChrisR)
             Points echoed on NPR just now, Dave Martin - - (Ashton)

Dutch man on the mizzen mast!
57 ms