IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New question "waterfall" by looking at the discussion
it sounds like process control
get a project
write requirements doc
decide on a technology
user interviews
determine modules needed
write psuedo code to describe what is needed
hand documents to programmer
modules get functional tested
load tested
handed off to ops
implemented
maintenance
never heard that phrase before.

thanx,
bill



Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 50 years. meep
New Same thing
[link|http://www.google.com/search?q=%22waterfall+development+methodology%22&sourceid=mozilla-search&start=0&start=0&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official|http://www.google.co...la:en-US:official]
New sheesh reinventing the 1970 wheel :-) new name to me anyway
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 50 years. meep
New Was coined in 1970
[link|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waterfall_model|http://en.wikipedia....i/Waterfall_model]
New All you need to know
can be learned by going to the annual conference:

[link|http://www.waterfall2006.com/|http://www.waterfall2006.com/]

--
Chris Altmann
New Do the Agile guys picket the conference? ;-)
















[one of these days, I am gonna learn to type, dammit!]
jb4
"Every Repbulican who wants to defend Bush on [the expansion of Presidential powers], should be forced to say, 'I wouldn't hesitate to see President Hillary Rodham Clinton have the same authority'."
&mdash an unidentified letter writer to Newsweek on the expansion of executive powers under the Bush administration
Expand Edited by jb4 Feb. 9, 2006, 11:40:49 AM EST
New Cute
[link|http://www.waterfall2006.com/kroll.html|http://www.waterfall2006.com/kroll.html]

ICLRPD:
So, join us for this refreshing lecture on waterfall made easy, and remember--real men do not do agile!
     "backshoring?" - (cforde) - (20)
         There are a lot of disasters out there - (ben_tilly) - (19)
             Which came first? - (drewk) - (18)
                 Your bet is wrong - (ben_tilly) - (17)
                     Call me a cynic - (drewk) - (9)
                         "Okay, you're a cynic." There, now no one else has to do it. -NT - (drewk)
                         No, I'll just call you wrong. :-P - (ben_tilly) - (7)
                             Okay, my statement was too broad - (drewk)
                             Re: No, I'll just call you wrong. :-P - (JimWeirich) - (5)
                                 We're mostly in agreement. - (ben_tilly) - (4)
                                     That can't be true - (drewk) - (3)
                                         PHB meets reality. Reality ignores PHB. -NT - (ben_tilly) - (2)
                                             Damnfrigafraggamumblesputtercheckboxesfrigafraggamumble! -NT - (jb4)
                                             ICLRPD (new thread) - (jb4)
                     question "waterfall" by looking at the discussion - (boxley) - (6)
                         Same thing - (broomberg) - (5)
                             sheesh reinventing the 1970 wheel :-) new name to me anyway -NT - (boxley) - (4)
                                 Was coined in 1970 - (broomberg)
                                 All you need to know - (altmann) - (2)
                                     Do the Agile guys picket the conference? ;-) - (jb4)
                                     Cute - (broomberg)

The style is new but the pay is the same.
57 ms