If it's brought forward from legacy stuff . . .

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #241,602 by Andrew Grygus 1/17/06 2:41:55 AM Reply	If it's brought forward from legacy stuff . . . . . how come legacy Windows isn't vulnerable? The features enabling the vulnerability were introduced in Windows 2000 and XP. [link\|http://www.aaxnet.com\|AAx]
Post #241,637 by mmoffitt 1/17/06 11:03:40 AM Reply	Dang. Beat me to it. That was my first thought. bcnu, Mikem It would seem, therefore, that the three human impulses embodied in religion are fear, conceit, and hatred. The purpose of religion, one might say, is to give an air of respectibility to these passions. -- Bertrand Russell
Post #241,675 by altmann 1/17/06 8:29:52 PM Reply	No default program for WMF = No "critical" vulnerability -- Chris Altmann

Steve Gibson: "WMF flaw was a deliberate back door". - (Andrew Grygus) - (30) - Jan. 13, 2006, 07:13:31 PM EST

He needs to adjust his tinfoil IMHO -NT - (altmann) - (9) - Jan. 13, 2006, 08:24:32 PM EST

He's got a pretty good case - (bepatient) - (8) - Jan. 13, 2006, 09:28:28 PM EST

Yup - (broomberg) - Jan. 13, 2006, 09:46:45 PM EST

Is there more in it that what was in the transcript? - (altmann) - (3) - Jan. 14, 2006, 03:33:27 AM EST

Where'd you find a transcript? - (jb4) - (2) - Jan. 15, 2006, 12:56:46 PM EST

On GRC - (Another Scott) - Jan. 15, 2006, 01:00:50 PM EST

Podcast is just an MP3 -NT - (drewk) - Jan. 15, 2006, 08:56:10 PM EST

A guy over at SysInternals is said to be . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (2) - Jan. 14, 2006, 08:05:11 PM EST

Sysinternals verdict: Not a back door - (altmann) - (1) - Jan. 21, 2006, 04:21:27 AM EST

Just stupidity and incompetence, eh? SOP for M$. -NT - (n3jja) - Jan. 21, 2006, 08:31:13 AM EST

Seems very unlikely to me - (JayMehaffey) - (13) - Jan. 16, 2006, 03:18:21 PM EST

But thats just as bad - (bepatient) - (5) - Jan. 16, 2006, 04:07:08 PM EST

Do I unnderstand this right? - (drewk) - (3) - Jan. 16, 2006, 05:03:27 PM EST

did $MS understand multithreading when they wrote it? -NT - (boxley) - Jan. 16, 2006, 05:17:35 PM EST

It is part of that - (JayMehaffey) - Jan. 16, 2006, 06:38:38 PM EST

No. - (broomberg) - Jan. 16, 2006, 09:08:08 PM EST

I would say not quite as bad - (JayMehaffey) - Jan. 16, 2006, 06:43:55 PM EST

Microsoft have an explanation. - (static) - (6) - Jan. 18, 2006, 01:02:33 AM EST

Artful Dodging - (admin) - (1) - Jan. 16, 2006, 11:01:16 PM EST

Link fixed. - (static) - Jan. 18, 2006, 01:08:26 AM EST

I like how that "blog" doesn't allow comments, too. -NT - (admin) - Jan. 16, 2006, 11:02:31 PM EST

If it's brought forward from legacy stuff . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (2) - Jan. 17, 2006, 02:41:55 AM EST

Dang. Beat me to it. That was my first thought. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (1) - Jan. 17, 2006, 11:03:40 AM EST

No default program for WMF = No "critical" vulnerability -NT - (altmann) - Jan. 17, 2006, 08:29:52 PM EST

Interesting "analysis" / Guess-of-motives - (Ashton) - (5) - Jan. 21, 2006, 06:42:09 AM EST

Shields up is a waste of time. - (pwhysall) - (4) - Jan. 21, 2006, 11:24:14 AM EST

Elitist smugness - (Ashton) - (3) - Jan. 29, 2006, 06:10:34 AM EST

Whatever, Ash. - (pwhysall) - (2) - Jan. 29, 2006, 07:52:18 AM EST

Sorry Ash, but Peter is right here. -NT - (inthane-chan) - Jan. 29, 2006, 10:43:04 AM EST

I acknowledge those valld criticisms. - (Ashton) - Jan. 30, 2006, 05:35:00 AM EST

A few slices of bread short of a loaf.
195 ms