Which I find interesting...

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #2,338 by inthane-chan 7/19/01 2:10:06 PM Reply	Which I find interesting... ...because my feeling is that people voted for Perot not so much as a backlash against Clinton, but as a backlash against Bush.
Post #2,353 by Steve Lowe 7/19/01 3:49:58 PM Reply	In Both Perot was a factor in both..I heard it said many times that a "vote for Perot is a vote for Clinton." Pretty much the same as 2000 with Nader affecting the Dems. ----- Steve
Post #2,390 by rsf 7/19/01 8:38:49 PM Reply	Re: Which I find interesting... I've heard this often in '92 from former Reps who voted for Perot. Many were ticked about the 'No new taxes' line, only to have the taxes increase in Bush Sr. term. Of course the were other things to dislike about Bush Sr. but this is the one thing I remember distinctly. Ray

Florida vote counting revisited. - (a6l6e6x) - (48) - July 14, 2001, 10:03:59 PM EDT

err you are confused - (boxley) - (3) - July 15, 2001, 12:12:05 AM EDT

Interesting.. - (Simon_Jester) - (2) - July 15, 2001, 02:30:48 PM EDT

Re: Interesting.. - (jp) - July 15, 2001, 04:09:03 PM EDT

nope all amil was shipped via mil transpo - (boxley) - July 15, 2001, 11:39:17 PM EDT

And more. - (mmoffitt) - (43) - July 18, 2001, 10:16:50 AM EDT

I love this stuff... - (bepatient) - (29) - July 18, 2001, 01:46:48 PM EDT

Um... - (Simon_Jester) - (26) - July 18, 2001, 03:22:40 PM EDT

Speaking of lost... - (addison) - (25) - July 18, 2001, 03:48:19 PM EDT

Well, I will admit '96 was better than '92... - (Simon_Jester) - (24) - July 19, 2001, 08:43:37 AM EDT

I'm still lost. - (addison) - (22) - July 19, 2001, 11:34:08 AM EDT

Where there was disputes back in '92? - (Simon_Jester) - (21) - July 19, 2001, 01:13:30 PM EDT

I don't see that as the same thing. - (addison) - (16) - July 19, 2001, 01:47:06 PM EDT

Okay, I'm lost now... - (Simon_Jester) - (15) - July 19, 2001, 02:09:04 PM EDT

Don't get eaten by a grue. - (addison) - (6) - July 19, 2001, 02:40:16 PM EDT

Slow down there pilgrim... :-) - (Simon_Jester) - (5) - July 19, 2001, 04:27:08 PM EDT

Re: Slow down there pilgrim... :-) - (addison) - (4) - July 19, 2001, 11:53:32 PM EDT

Okay...point by point... - (Simon_Jester) - (3) - July 20, 2001, 08:27:07 AM EDT

Back to the main point - (addison) - (2) - July 20, 2001, 10:08:22 AM EDT

You're right.... - (Simon_Jester) - (1) - July 20, 2001, 12:05:09 PM EDT

Thanks. - (addison) - July 20, 2001, 02:48:37 PM EDT

Still a difference - (drewk) - (7) - July 19, 2001, 02:46:54 PM EDT

the votes dont matter anyway in Florida - (boxley) - (6) - July 19, 2001, 03:03:36 PM EDT

That is the real issue. - (mmoffitt) - (5) - July 24, 2001, 12:02:26 PM EDT

Well I like the current system sorta - (boxley) - (4) - July 24, 2001, 07:14:27 PM EDT

I don't think the Justices could be impeached. - (Simon_Jester) - (1) - July 25, 2001, 09:33:10 AM EDT

that is the only way you can get rid of them - (boxley) - July 25, 2001, 10:17:07 AM EDT

"3 votes per" - spoken like true Alaskan. :) -NT - (a6l6e6x) - (1) - July 25, 2001, 12:57:11 PM EDT

50*3+14DC!/2 :) -NT - (boxley) - July 25, 2001, 07:03:49 PM EDT

Re: Where there was disputes back in '92? - (Fearless Freep) - (3) - July 19, 2001, 01:54:49 PM EDT

Which I find interesting... - (inthane-chan) - (2) - July 19, 2001, 02:10:06 PM EDT

In Both - (Steve Lowe) - July 19, 2001, 03:49:58 PM EDT

Re: Which I find interesting... - (rsf) - July 19, 2001, 08:38:49 PM EDT

That'd be a first! - (mmoffitt) - July 24, 2001, 11:41:28 AM EDT

"the Dems are going to spend the next 3 years stuck in y2k" - (DonRichards) - July 18, 2001, 03:38:43 PM EDT

Re: I love this stuff... - (a6l6e6x) - July 18, 2001, 03:57:16 PM EDT

Slightly OT Gore is coming back - (boxley) - (12) - July 18, 2001, 09:56:12 PM EDT

Geez Bill, John Edwards is just another Clinton. - (a6l6e6x) - (11) - July 18, 2001, 11:28:55 PM EDT

Silly question... - (Simon_Jester) - (4) - July 19, 2001, 08:47:10 AM EDT

It was not just a question of suing. - (a6l6e6x) - (3) - July 19, 2001, 04:29:23 PM EDT

unlimited damges is important bu not for lawyers - (boxley) - (2) - July 20, 2001, 02:16:04 PM EDT

Re: important for lawyers - "Progress Through Litigation". - (a6l6e6x) - (1) - July 20, 2001, 03:58:31 PM EDT

if yer gonna cap cap the contingency percentage - (boxley) - July 20, 2001, 04:23:06 PM EDT

Silly question... - (Simon_Jester) - July 19, 2001, 08:47:14 AM EDT

He is on the right side of privacy on the net - (boxley) - (1) - July 19, 2001, 10:04:01 AM EDT

Re: Privacy on the net -- Yep, not all bad. -NT - (a6l6e6x) - July 19, 2001, 04:49:09 PM EDT

Why is my constitutional right - (boxley) - (2) - July 19, 2001, 10:07:59 AM EDT

See my comment to Jester, above. - (a6l6e6x) - (1) - July 19, 2001, 04:47:30 PM EDT

I'd rather look like a patient. -NT - (mmoffitt) - July 24, 2001, 01:09:26 PM EDT

iwethey.org

Can bitching and moaning atone?
75 ms