IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Breaking news on BBC: made in Italy and passed on by the UK
The parliamentary session just concluded in Italy. According to the report, the forgery was done in Rome by three (unnamed for now) Italians. The forgery was given credibility by passing everything through the British intelligence agencies.
New Seems to be a bit of confusion in Italy.
[link|http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/4402594.stm|BBC]:

An Italian senator has withdrawn a claim that Rome had warned the US some of the intelligence used to justify Iraq's invasion was forged.

Senator Massimo Brutti initially made the allegation after a secret briefing by intelligence chief Nicolo Pollari to members of parliament in Rome.

During the briefing, Mr Pollari denied media reports that Italy had helped disseminating a forged dossier.

The dossier falsely accused Iraq of trying to buy uranium from Niger.

Originally Mr Brutti said that Mr Pollari, director of the Italian military intelligence agency, had told parliament that his services had warned the US that it was false.

But Mr Brutti later withdrew the remark.

He said he had become confused when facing a barrage of questions by reporters.


FWIW.

Cheers,
Scott.
New Confusion was surely part of the desired effect
Have whatever values you have. That's what America is for.
You don't need George Bush for that.
New Lots of confusion in and about Italy...
Committee members said they were shown documents defending General Pollari, including a copy of a classified letter from Robert S. Muller III, the director of the F.B.I., dated July 20, which praised Italy's cooperation with the bureau.

In Washington, an official at the bureau confirmed the substance of the letter, whose contents were first reported Tuesday in the leftist newspaper L'Unit\ufffd. The letter stated that Italy's cooperation proved the bureau's theory that the false documents were produced and disseminated by one or more people for personal profit, and ruled out the possibility that the Italian service had intended to influence American policy, the newspaper said.

As a result, the letter said, according to both the F.B.I. official and L'Unit\ufffd, the bureau had closed its investigation into the origin of the documents.
[link|http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/04/international/europe/04italy.html| NY Times ]

However...
One striking aspect of the FBI's investigation is that, at least as of this week, Martino has told associates he has never even been interviewed by the bureau-despite the fact that he was publicly identified by the Financial Times of London as the source of the documents more than six weeks ago and was subsequently flown to New York City by CBS to be interviewed for the "60 Minutes" report.

A U.S. law-enforcement official said the FBI is seeking to interview Martino, but has not yet received permission to do so from the Italian government. The official declined to comment on other aspects of the investigation.
[link|http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/issues/iraq/media/2004/0922cbs.htm| Source ]

Someone doesn't want us to know where those forged documents came from.

New It can hardly be considered a wowee shocker
that someone doesn't want us to know where they came from.

The whole thing reeks.
--\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton                            jake at consultron.ca *\n* [link|http://consultron.ca|http://consultron.ca]                   [link|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] *\n* Kingston Ontario Canada               [link|news://news.consultron.ca|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------
New Amazing how fast things change...
I posted that last night as I listed to the BBC late night news broadcast. There wasn't much room for confusion in the way this was reported then. "Made in Rome by three Italians" is a verbatim quote, and it continued on by explicitly stating that British intelligence had wilfully functioned as an echo chamber to hide the source and allow DC to claim they were not alone in believing the documents were real.

Not a trace of that anywhere, even though the web article doesn't invalidate the broadcast (I didn't hear the reporter say Sismi was responsible).
     Who forged the Niger documents? - (Silverlock) - (8)
         According to Italy... - (Simon_Jester) - (7)
             Before you trust Don Berlusconi... - (scoenye)
             Breaking news on BBC: made in Italy and passed on by the UK - (scoenye) - (5)
                 Seems to be a bit of confusion in Italy. - (Another Scott) - (4)
                     Confusion was surely part of the desired effect -NT - (GBert)
                     Lots of confusion in and about Italy... - (Simon_Jester) - (1)
                         It can hardly be considered a wowee shocker - (jake123)
                     Amazing how fast things change... - (scoenye)

Idiocy is relative.
62 ms