IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Patent Wars and Antitrust Forum / It's a URI. It doesn't have to.
Post #230,669
by altmann
10/24/05 3:19:43 PM
Reply
New It's a URI. It doesn't have to.
--
Chris Altmann
Post #230,788
by folkert
Picture of folkert
10/25/05 10:04:03 AM
Reply
New But, how are
verification programs or format checking programs supposed to reference the the DTD describing the "format"?

Lets make sure we understand, a URL is a URI.

And why doesn't Microsoft have a schema similarly available for its XML format?

Oh, here is the OASIS Stuff for ODT:
  • [link|http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/12571/OpenDocument-schema-v1.0-os.rng|Open Documnet Schema]
  • [link|http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/12570/OpenDocument-manifest-schema-v1.0-os.rng|Open Document Manifest Schema]
  • [link|http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/12569/OpenDocument-strict-schema-v1.0-os.rng|Open Document Strict Schema]
  • [link|http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/12572/OpenDocument-v1.0-os.pdf|For those who want the PDF]
So, I guess, you now understand what I mean (I hope)

And here is a good DTD for XML in any case:
[link|http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema.dtd|W3C's XML Schema DTD] and [link|http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-datatypes|W3C's XML Schema Datatypes]
Which is a good place to start.
--
[link|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net|greg],
[link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ iwethey
Freedom is not FREE.
Yeah, but 10s of Trillions of US Dollars?
SELECT * FROM scog WHERE ethics > 0;

0 rows returned.
     Dave Winer thinks Microsoft is in the right about its XML. - (static) - (40) - Oct. 13, 2005, 09:56:07 PM EDT
         Dave Winer is pretty much a numbskull anyway. - (CRConrad) - Oct. 13, 2005, 03:50:00 AM EDT
         He's surprised? - (Andrew Grygus) - Oct. 13, 2005, 05:21:47 AM EDT
         You get the Bob Award for the day. - (Yendor) - (24) - Oct. 13, 2005, 08:44:34 AM EDT
             We need a weecode for this. -NT - (pwhysall) - (4) - Oct. 13, 2005, 10:47:43 AM EDT
                 No, we REALLY don't - (hnick) - (3) - Oct. 13, 2005, 11:36:02 AM EDT
                     Hear, Hear! -NT - (imric) - Oct. 13, 2005, 12:00:59 PM EDT
                     How about us polite pedants? -NT - (drewk) - (1) - Oct. 13, 2005, 12:08:56 PM EDT
                         Well, if you're polite enough, you won't need it... :) -NT - (hnick) - Oct. 13, 2005, 12:40:08 PM EDT
             It's a special case - (ChrisR) - (17) - Oct. 13, 2005, 05:22:33 PM EDT
                 Except that the possessive of "it" is "its" not "it's" - (drewk) - (5) - Oct. 13, 2005, 05:36:22 PM EDT
                     Not quite the right reason - (jake123) - (4) - Oct. 13, 2005, 05:40:31 PM EDT
                         Its? It's stupid! - (ben_tilly) - (3) - Oct. 13, 2005, 05:55:27 PM EDT
                             Not that hard to tell - (jake123) - (1) - Oct. 13, 2005, 05:57:18 PM EDT
                                 It's ambiguous - (ben_tilly) - Oct. 13, 2005, 05:59:55 PM EDT
                             Ahh, YAN argument for Victor Borge's Audible Punctuation :-) -NT - (Ashton) - Oct. 13, 2005, 06:26:49 PM EDT
                 Fascinating, how so many native speakers of English... - (CRConrad) - (9) - Oct. 15, 2005, 05:08:38 PM EDT
                     Hey.. it's like this-yere - (Ashton) - Oct. 15, 2005, 10:41:35 PM EDT
                     its is a polit way to write "grunt" -NT - (boxley) - Oct. 15, 2005, 10:42:45 PM EDT
                     I's will do it at each and every possible opportunity now.. - (hnick) - (6) - Oct. 16, 2005, 09:03:14 AM EDT
                         (I think we found Hugh's button.) - (Another Scott) - (1) - Oct. 16, 2005, 10:19:30 AM EDT
                             MWHAAHAAAA!! -NT - (hnick) - Oct. 16, 2005, 11:47:33 AM EDT
                         "Pisces", perhaps? HTH! - (CRConrad) - (1) - Oct. 16, 2005, 05:03:26 PM EDT
                             ...as in "off"? - (pwhysall) - Oct. 16, 2005, 05:08:42 PM EDT
                         Halleluiah! - (imqwerky) - Oct. 16, 2005, 05:39:23 PM EDT
                         Yabut.. the scary part is - - (Ashton) - Oct. 17, 2005, 06:07:56 AM EDT
                 Ooops! CRC gets all medieval on yer ass! -NT - (jb4) - Oct. 17, 2005, 05:35:06 PM EDT
             D'oh. Fixed. - (static) - Oct. 13, 2005, 09:57:34 PM EDT
         Microsoft XML Sample - (tuberculosis) - (12) - Oct. 21, 2005, 04:23:02 PM EDT
             That's what the OpenDocument guys are complaining about. -NT - (static) - Oct. 23, 2005, 10:43:49 PM EDT
             Re: Microsoft XML Sample - (altmann) - (10) - Oct. 24, 2005, 03:07:44 AM EDT
                 That "link" doesn't work - (drewk) - (9) - Oct. 24, 2005, 09:58:20 AM EDT
                     Well, duuuh. - (folkert) - (6) - Oct. 24, 2005, 10:24:30 AM EDT
                         Point was ... - (drewk) - (5) - Oct. 24, 2005, 10:58:03 AM EDT
                             Sorry, that's proprietary. -NT - (Andrew Grygus) - (1) - Oct. 24, 2005, 11:05:37 AM EDT
                                 ICLRPD: Sorry, that's proprietary. (new thread) - (Steve Lowe) - Oct. 24, 2005, 03:59:33 PM EDT
                             That is on a knead to know baseless. - (folkert) - (2) - Oct. 24, 2005, 12:32:14 PM EDT
                                 knead this - (altmann) - (1) - Oct. 24, 2005, 03:15:36 PM EDT
                                     I would love to download those references... - (folkert) - Oct. 25, 2005, 09:33:11 AM EDT
                     It's a URI. It doesn't have to. -NT - (altmann) - (1) - Oct. 24, 2005, 03:19:43 PM EDT
                         But, how are - (folkert) - Oct. 25, 2005, 10:04:03 AM EDT

They just don't work, in the real world outside Gosling's beard.
93 ms