They are the same card...

1,095 registered users | 2 active users | 1 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #2,212 by hnick 7/18/01 1:12:05 PM Reply	They are the same card... Xircom just rebadges the Cisco PC340. The drivers and utilities are the same (except for cosmetics like the Xircom logo...) The PC350 PHY supports more power than the PC340. Regards, Hugh
Post #2,287 by static 7/19/01 2:03:44 AM Reply	Ah... I was wondering the difference 'tween the 340 and the 350. And I discovered today that Compaq rebadges Lucent stuff. My [link\|http://www.apcmag.com/\|APC] came today with a review of just this range of hardware. Talk about synchronicity! Wade. "All around me are nothing but fakes Come with me on the biggest fake of all!"
Post #2,351 by hnick 7/19/01 3:46:24 PM Reply	A thought about the power... The 340 generally supports 30 milliWatts, while the 350 supports UP TO 100mW. The "up to" is defined by governmental standards. Cards for shipment out of the U.S. are set at the factory to conform to the end users regulations. 350's going to Japan, for example, won't do more than 50mW, even though the PHY will do 100mW. I have no idea what your local power rates are. Just thought I'd mention it... Regards, Hugh

Wireless Networking research. - (static) - (6) - July 17, 2001, 09:31:06 PM EDT

Addendum. - (static) - (3) - July 17, 2001, 09:33:18 PM EDT

They are the same card... - (hnick) - (2) - July 18, 2001, 01:12:05 PM EDT

Ah... - (static) - (1) - July 19, 2001, 02:03:44 AM EDT

A thought about the power... - (hnick) - July 19, 2001, 03:46:24 PM EDT

I've a Linksys base and D-Link nic - (SpiceWare) - (1) - July 18, 2001, 05:18:08 PM EDT

D-Link's been pretty good for me, so far, as well. - (tseliot) - July 23, 2001, 11:52:00 AM EDT

The telltale breath with sen-sen.
69 ms