This has been bugging me. - (imric) - (72) - Aug. 8, 2005, 01:28:30 PM EDT
         It's the usual cack. - (pwhysall) - (13) - Aug. 8, 2005, 01:58:45 PM EDT
             Nonsense, Peter. - (imric) - (12) - Aug. 8, 2005, 02:19:00 PM EDT
                 I repeat. - (pwhysall) - (3) - Aug. 8, 2005, 02:27:25 PM EDT
                     I care about this, Peter. - (imric) - (2) - Aug. 8, 2005, 02:38:01 PM EDT
                         I don't doubt that you care. - (pwhysall) - (1) - Aug. 8, 2005, 02:44:15 PM EDT
                             It's true that it may be less of a problem - (imric) - Aug. 8, 2005, 02:53:44 PM EDT
                 the fact that you dont distribute your software - (boxley) - (1) - Aug. 8, 2005, 02:32:11 PM EDT
                     disgruntled >>--> Whistleblower laws. -NT - (imric) - Aug. 8, 2005, 02:39:50 PM EDT
                 Also, looky here: - (pwhysall) - (5) - Aug. 8, 2005, 02:32:33 PM EDT
                     ICLRPD (new thread) - (Steve Lowe) - Aug. 8, 2005, 02:41:18 PM EDT
                     Woo hoo. - (imric) - (2) - Aug. 8, 2005, 02:42:17 PM EDT
                         Remember, existing GPLv2 software will remain GPLv2 - (pwhysall) - (1) - Aug. 8, 2005, 02:46:09 PM EDT
                             ROFL - just posted that is a mitigating factor... - (imric) - Aug. 8, 2005, 02:54:36 PM EDT
                     He who controls the compiler... - (ChrisR) - Aug. 8, 2005, 02:49:32 PM EDT
         How is it ridiculous? - (JayMehaffey) - (36) - Aug. 8, 2005, 03:49:56 PM EDT
             Bravo. -NT - (folkert) - (23) - Aug. 8, 2005, 04:01:32 PM EDT
                 Guess you don't want to use application source - (imric) - (22) - Aug. 8, 2005, 04:04:34 PM EDT
                     Here is my grounds for poo-pooing your concern. - (folkert) - (6) - Aug. 8, 2005, 06:10:58 PM EDT
                         No. Wrong. And this is why - (imric) - (5) - Aug. 8, 2005, 09:25:40 PM EDT
                             Exactly the kind of response I expected. - (folkert) - (4) - Aug. 8, 2005, 09:35:15 PM EDT
                                 Horsecrap. - (imric) - (3) - Aug. 8, 2005, 10:00:19 PM EDT
                                     The binaries have not been distributed . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (2) - Aug. 8, 2005, 10:52:35 PM EDT
                                         And then GPL4. - (imric) - Aug. 8, 2005, 10:53:45 PM EDT
                                         Or most OSS used for web services won't be GPL3 -NT - (tonytib) - Aug. 9, 2005, 11:09:09 AM EDT
                     Another train of thought, I need to mention. - (folkert) - (5) - Aug. 8, 2005, 06:23:20 PM EDT
                         question, using go-global - (boxley) - (1) - Aug. 8, 2005, 06:35:34 PM EDT
                             I knowest not. -NT - (folkert) - Aug. 8, 2005, 06:36:27 PM EDT
                         Since MS software is licenced per user - (imric) - (2) - Aug. 8, 2005, 09:26:59 PM EDT
                             No... there is only one user. - (folkert) - (1) - Aug. 8, 2005, 09:33:46 PM EDT
                                 Again, ridiculous. - (imric) - Aug. 8, 2005, 09:59:23 PM EDT
                     Excuse me. I am a programmer. - (ben_tilly) - (8) - Aug. 8, 2005, 07:55:39 PM EDT
                         there is a place for all kinds - (boxley) - (1) - Aug. 8, 2005, 08:35:29 PM EDT
                             Perl's licensing situation is interesting - (ben_tilly) - Aug. 8, 2005, 08:47:14 PM EDT
                         Not at all, Ben. - (imric) - (5) - Aug. 8, 2005, 09:44:15 PM EDT
                             Perspective is all - (ChrisR) - (4) - Aug. 8, 2005, 09:57:19 PM EDT
                                 Pirates? - (imric) - (3) - Aug. 8, 2005, 10:11:53 PM EDT
                                     Pirate analogy is a different issue - (ChrisR) - (2) - Aug. 8, 2005, 10:42:16 PM EDT
                                         I disagree - (broomberg) - (1) - Aug. 8, 2005, 10:46:16 PM EDT
                                             The original instigation for FSF - (ChrisR) - Aug. 8, 2005, 11:16:18 PM EDT
             How is that a 'loophole' unless - (imric) - (11) - Aug. 8, 2005, 04:01:46 PM EDT
                 It's a loophole for the FSF. - (pwhysall) - (6) - Aug. 8, 2005, 04:05:12 PM EDT
                     http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=21 - (imric) - (2) - Aug. 8, 2005, 04:07:22 PM EDT
                         Your point? - (pwhysall) - (1) - Aug. 8, 2005, 04:10:54 PM EDT
                             I started this - (imric) - Aug. 8, 2005, 04:28:30 PM EDT
                     Business Interests - (ChrisR) - (2) - Aug. 8, 2005, 04:25:20 PM EDT
                         Most businesses... - (pwhysall) - Aug. 8, 2005, 04:28:35 PM EDT
                         Same difference, if the apps are GPLed. -NT - (imric) - Aug. 8, 2005, 04:29:02 PM EDT
                 It's contrary to the spirit of the GPL - (JayMehaffey) - (3) - Aug. 8, 2005, 06:45:32 PM EDT
                     Except, of course - (imric) - (2) - Aug. 8, 2005, 10:16:36 PM EDT
                         Not anti-Buisness - (JayMehaffey) - (1) - Aug. 8, 2005, 10:47:55 PM EDT
                             *shrug* same as BSD - (imric) - Aug. 8, 2005, 10:50:32 PM EDT
         Sorry Skip, you are lacking some significant clues - (ben_tilly) - (3) - Aug. 8, 2005, 07:41:42 PM EDT
             Ruining business? - (imric) - (2) - Aug. 8, 2005, 10:06:32 PM EDT
                 And you're still missing the point - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Aug. 9, 2005, 02:42:27 AM EDT
                     And that's what I did - I slept on it. - (imric) - Aug. 9, 2005, 07:08:34 AM EDT
         I was going to say something smart-ass here, - (broomberg) - (14) - Aug. 8, 2005, 09:11:07 PM EDT
             No. You are not listening. Just like the rest. - (imric) - (13) - Aug. 8, 2005, 09:58:06 PM EDT
                 Re: No. You are not listening. Just like the rest. - (bepatient) - Aug. 8, 2005, 10:11:23 PM EDT
                 Religion? - (broomberg) - (5) - Aug. 8, 2005, 10:32:07 PM EDT
                     Listen carefully, now. - (imric) - (4) - Aug. 8, 2005, 10:47:31 PM EDT
                         A collective yawn - (ChrisR) - (3) - Aug. 8, 2005, 11:37:29 PM EDT
                             Long term = 0 - (bepatient) - Aug. 9, 2005, 01:01:56 AM EDT
                             I don't think he's talking about selling mods . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (1) - Aug. 9, 2005, 01:15:34 AM EDT
                                 Correct - reselling not the point. - (imric) - Aug. 9, 2005, 07:00:45 AM EDT
                 I think I understand where you're coming from. - (Another Scott) - (1) - Aug. 8, 2005, 10:49:19 PM EDT
                     Yeah. I think the 'coming fork' is a bad thing, though -NT - (imric) - Aug. 8, 2005, 11:09:48 PM EDT
                 I think this is where you are going wrong - (JayMehaffey) - Aug. 8, 2005, 11:10:42 PM EDT
                 I am not missing this point. - (folkert) - (2) - Aug. 9, 2005, 05:53:10 PM EDT
                     I see what you're saying - (imric) - (1) - Aug. 9, 2005, 06:13:59 PM EDT
                         BTW, this discussion should really be moved to (new thread) - (imric) - Aug. 9, 2005, 06:15:33 PM EDT
         Several things - (ubernostrum) - (1) - Aug. 9, 2005, 07:32:38 AM EDT
             More good points (new thread) - (imric) - Aug. 9, 2005, 08:47:45 AM EDT