Actually, no; both are '. [Duh-the other was what you said!]

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #217,875 by CRConrad 8/6/05 7:24:57 PM 8/6/05 7:34:54 PM Reply	Actually, no; both are '. [Duh-the other was what you said!] So, umm... What was your edit? To me, both versions look exactly the same. And it still reads "...being normative with...", which is a somewhat peculiar usage of "normative", that I neither recognize nor could swear that I understand what you mean by it here. But, "grammer"(sic)? No, I don't think so. AFAIK, word meaning is a subject distinct from grammar(sic!). [link\|mailto:MyUserId@MyISP.CountryCode\|Christian R. Conrad] (I live in Finland, and my e-mail in-box is at the Saunalahti company.) Your lies are of Microsoftian Scale and boring to boot. Your 'depression' may be the closest you ever come to recognizing truth: you have no 'inferiority complex', you are inferior - and something inside you recognizes this. - [link\|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=71575\|Ashton Brown] Edited by CRConrad Aug. 6, 2005, 07:34:54 PM EDT Expand All History
Post #217,894 by folkert 8/6/05 10:10:19 PM Reply	too vs. to in the title. -- [link\|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net\|greg], [link\|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry\|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ *i_wethey* [image\|http://www.danasoft.com/vipersig.jpg\|\|\|\|]
Post #218,002 by CRConrad 8/7/05 5:22:42 PM Reply	Ah, thanks! (Heck, that is a hard one to catch, isn't it?)
Post #218,010 by folkert 8/7/05 6:03:37 PM Reply	You, usually do. -- [link\|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net\|greg], [link\|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry\|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ *i_wethey* [image\|http://www.danasoft.com/vipersig.jpg\|\|\|\|]

Stupid Python question - (inthane-chan) - (7) - Aug. 4, 2005, 03:43:56 PM EDT

Would make it look too much like Pascal - (ChrisR) - (5) - Aug. 4, 2005, 03:54:45 PM EDT

Only if you want the Double-Whammy from CRC. HTH! -NT - (Another Scott) - Aug. 4, 2005, 04:00:44 PM EDT

Actually, no; both are '. [Duh-the other was what you said!] - (CRConrad) - (3) - Aug. 6, 2005, 07:34:54 PM EDT

too vs. to in the title. -NT - (folkert) - (2) - Aug. 6, 2005, 10:10:19 PM EDT

Ah, thanks! (Heck, that *is* a hard one to catch, isn't it?) -NT - (CRConrad) - (1) - Aug. 7, 2005, 05:22:42 PM EDT

You, usually do. -NT - (folkert) - Aug. 7, 2005, 06:03:37 PM EDT

Yes. - (admin) - Aug. 4, 2005, 05:06:32 PM EDT

iwethey.org

Does that mean my tea's made?
173 ms