Re: That would be enough for me not to use arch

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #202,518

by JimWeirich

4/8/05 4:30:28 PM

Re: That would be enough for me not to use arch

[...] could speed up more easily than arch could (mess of shell scripts last I checked).

arch has had a C based implementation for some time ... can't comment on the "mess" part. :)

--
-- Jim Weirich jim@weirichhouse.org [link|http://onestepback.org|http://onestepback.org]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
"Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct,
not tried it." -- Donald Knuth (in a memo to Peter van Emde Boas)

Linus and source code control - (bluke) - (6) - April 7, 2005, 06:43:07 AM EDT

GNU Arch comes closest. -NT - (pwhysall) - (5) - April 7, 2005, 07:10:46 AM EDT

Interestingly enough Linus seems to prefer Monotone - (bluke) - (4) - April 7, 2005, 07:22:49 AM EDT

I think I know why... - (pwhysall) - (3) - April 7, 2005, 07:24:13 AM EDT

That would be enough for me not to use arch - (ben_tilly) - (2) - April 7, 2005, 08:31:19 AM EDT

Seems like all of them have performance issues - (JayMehaffey) - April 7, 2005, 11:50:11 AM EDT

Re: That would be enough for me not to use arch - (JimWeirich) - April 8, 2005, 04:30:28 PM EDT

iwethey.org

I'm sure I've heard those last 3 lines in an unsavoury movie.
30 ms