IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Databases Forum / UML is good at showing you where you screwed up
Post #201,825
by Arkadiy
Picture of Arkadiy
4/4/05 11:50:29 AM
Reply
New UML is good at showing you where you screwed up
In my experience, if the design cannot be expressed as a neat simple diagram, I am doing something wrong.
--


"Consider a perfectly spherical cow, radiating milk isotropically."

-- [link|http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/002008.html|Language Log]
Post #201,874
by jake123
4/4/05 4:43:52 PM
Reply
New I can see how that goes
I have to admit, I hadn't thought of it that way, but I can see why it would be good at showing those up.

Related to the relative levels of experience betwixt you and I, methinks. 
--\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton                            jake at consultron.ca *\n* [link|http://consultron.ca|http://consultron.ca]                   [link|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] *\n* Kingston Ontario Canada               [link|news://news.consultron.ca|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------
     Open Source modeling tools. - (mmoffitt) - (25) - March 9, 2005, 11:10:14 AM EST
         Re: Open Source modeling tools. - (systems) - April 1, 2005, 04:54:37 AM EST
         Re: Open Source modeling tools. - (pwhysall) - (20) - April 1, 2005, 06:11:00 AM EST
             Heh. That's my preference. - (mmoffitt) - (19) - April 1, 2005, 11:16:32 AM EST
                 So, use those - (jake123) - (18) - April 1, 2005, 11:56:42 AM EST
                     Max(cost): buy a new scanner/printer - (FuManChu) - (17) - April 1, 2005, 02:01:59 PM EST
                         I like it:) -NT - (jake123) - April 1, 2005, 02:35:07 PM EST
                         Re: Max(cost): buy a new scanner/printer - (systems) - (15) - April 1, 2005, 04:52:00 PM EST
                             I'd suggest using uml - (jake123) - (10) - April 1, 2005, 05:06:38 PM EST
                                 Re: I'd suggest using uml - (systems) - (9) - April 1, 2005, 05:19:06 PM EST
                                     What exactly do you mean by "model" here? -NT - (Arkadiy) - (7) - April 1, 2005, 05:32:06 PM EST
                                         Re: What exactly do you mean by "model" here? - (systems) - (6) - April 1, 2005, 05:51:59 PM EST
                                             If you want to have a diagram, - (Arkadiy) - April 1, 2005, 06:13:09 PM EST
                                             Low-tech approach - (drewk) - (4) - April 1, 2005, 11:14:39 PM EST
                                                 Re: Low-tech approach - (dws) - (3) - April 2, 2005, 12:07:15 AM EST
                                                     UML's good for docs - (jake123) - (2) - April 2, 2005, 02:43:31 PM EST
                                                         UML is good at showing you where you screwed up - (Arkadiy) - (1) - April 4, 2005, 11:50:29 AM EDT
                                                             I can see how that goes - (jake123) - April 4, 2005, 04:43:52 PM EDT
                                     I'm not sure - (jake123) - April 1, 2005, 06:20:22 PM EST
                             Models are only as good as their specs - (admin) - April 1, 2005, 06:12:29 PM EST
                             Holy... - (CRConrad) - (2) - April 2, 2005, 04:08:16 PM EST
                                 Re: Holy... - (systems) - April 2, 2005, 05:56:19 PM EST
                                 I don't KNOW it was humor - (broomberg) - April 2, 2005, 06:42:51 PM EST
         I wrote my own - (tuberculosis) - (2) - April 4, 2005, 01:14:42 AM EDT
             Object Role Modeling - (systems) - (1) - April 4, 2005, 02:13:35 PM EDT
                 Same old same old - (tuberculosis) - April 4, 2005, 10:48:17 PM EDT

A taste of the local Surf n'Quaff.
120 ms