Re: Gimp doesn't look anything like that on Linux

1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #201,370 by pwhysall 3/31/05 7:49:17 AM 3/31/05 8:44:00 AM Reply	Re: Gimp doesn't look anything like that on Linux That's VERY like an OS X file selector, innit? Like this one: [image\|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org/tmp/open2.png\|\|\|\|] Peter [link\|http://www.ubuntulinux.org\|Ubuntu Linux] [link\|http://www.kuro5hin.org\|There is no K5 Cabal] [link\|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org\|Home] Use P2P for legitimate purposes! Edited by pwhysall March 31, 2005, 08:44:00 AM EST Expand All History
Post #201,371 by admin 3/31/05 7:57:55 AM Reply	Only from the standpoint of the extra panel All of the Linux and Windows dialogs have this in common: as you navigate, the contents of the panel(s) changes. On Panther, you get new panels. The bit that struck me with the Evolution dialog was the left panel: drives on the top, user-defined locations on the bottom. Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Post #201,375 by admin 3/31/05 8:50:26 AM Reply	Same diff. You don't get the bottom scroll bar and extra panels on the Gimp one. Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."

File Open Dialogues - (pwhysall) - (25) - March 30, 2005, 12:19:58 PM EST

Win XP in "Windows Classic" theme - (Steve Lowe) - (1) - March 30, 2005, 12:27:25 PM EST

WinXP thumbnail view - (altmann) - March 31, 2005, 02:44:52 AM EST

Evolution (Gnome?) - (admin) - (6) - March 30, 2005, 12:34:03 PM EST

Yes they are, y'eejit :-) -NT - (pwhysall) - March 30, 2005, 12:32:52 PM EST

I think that's actually GTK-ish. - (static) - (4) - March 31, 2005, 12:52:03 AM EST

Gimp doesn't look anything like that on Linux - (admin) - (3) - March 31, 2005, 07:48:05 AM EST

Re: Gimp doesn't look anything like that on Linux - (pwhysall) - (2) - March 31, 2005, 08:44:00 AM EST

Only from the standpoint of the extra panel - (admin) - March 31, 2005, 07:57:55 AM EST

Same diff. - (admin) - March 31, 2005, 08:50:26 AM EST

The original innovation that started it all - (ChrisR) - (3) - March 30, 2005, 12:32:39 PM EST

Saw a terminal the other day - (admin) - (2) - March 30, 2005, 12:34:58 PM EST

DOSSHELL! - (pwhysall) - (1) - March 30, 2005, 12:35:40 PM EST

No... - (admin) - March 30, 2005, 12:37:26 PM EST

One for CRC - (altmann) - (2) - March 31, 2005, 02:46:36 AM EST

Heh... Borland C++, or Turbo Pascal for Windows? -NT - (CRConrad) - (1) - March 31, 2005, 10:37:05 AM EST

Close. Resource Workshop -NT - (altmann) - March 31, 2005, 05:10:14 PM EST

Here's one for you - (ubernostrum) - (3) - March 31, 2005, 11:26:48 AM EST

Now, that is what I call a - (folkert) - (1) - March 31, 2005, 12:04:15 PM EST

Well... - (ubernostrum) - April 1, 2005, 01:27:44 AM EST

Apparently that was the old version. - (ubernostrum) - April 1, 2005, 07:14:48 AM EST

I knew something was fishy... - (admin) - (4) - April 3, 2005, 09:55:44 AM EDT

Wot version? - (pwhysall) - (3) - April 3, 2005, 11:49:32 AM EDT

Dunno. Panther something. - (admin) - (2) - April 3, 2005, 03:36:53 PM EDT

Command-Shift-3 (or 4) do the trick, but as PDF :/ -NT - (Meerkat) - April 3, 2005, 06:00:11 PM EDT

Photoshop :-) - (pwhysall) - April 4, 2005, 01:07:04 AM EDT

Specifically, they will not save the ship and crew, they will not win a stack of quatloos, and they will especially not get to sleep
100 ms