Would it be bad to enable it?

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #200,686 by broomberg 3/26/05 8:30:43 PM Reply	Would it be bad to enable it? Security implication? Stability? How is mash able to be a server and not a client.
Post #200,694 by folkert 3/26/05 11:10:13 PM Reply	Okay, Shouldn't be a problem. Make these changes. `ports = 139 445` And comment out the: `netbios disabled = yes` -- [link\|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net\|greg], [link\|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry\|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ *i_wethey* [link\|http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=134485&cid=11233230\|"Microsoft Security" is an even better oxymoron than "Military Intelligence"] No matter how much Microsoft supporters whine about how Linux and other operating systems have just as many bugs as their operating systems do, the bottom line is that the serious, gut-wrenching problems happen on Windows, not on Linux, not on Mac OS. -- [link\|http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1622086,00.asp\|source]
Post #200,696 by broomberg 3/26/05 11:20:12 PM Reply	Same result Make the change, bounced smb. One thing I noticed. When I use smbclient (when it works) I notice the "added interface" lines, ie: added interface ip=XXX.25.223.131 bcast=XXX.25.223.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 added interface ip=XXX.25.223.150 bcast=XXX.25.223.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 But I never see that when I do it from mash.
Post #200,697 by folkert 3/26/05 11:26:00 PM Reply	Hmmm Did you guys add an Inteface to MASH? Or assign a second IP to that Interface? -- [link\|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net\|greg], [link\|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry\|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ *i_wethey* [link\|http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=134485&cid=11233230\|"Microsoft Security" is an even better oxymoron than "Military Intelligence"] No matter how much Microsoft supporters whine about how Linux and other operating systems have just as many bugs as their operating systems do, the bottom line is that the serious, gut-wrenching problems happen on Windows, not on Linux, not on Mac OS. -- [link\|http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1622086,00.asp\|source]
Post #200,698 by broomberg 3/26/05 11:28:40 PM Reply	Nope
Post #200,699 by folkert 3/26/05 11:29:53 PM Reply	I am going to be doing the updated Tomorrow Afternoon, I'll try a few things. If you could make a limited user I can use on the appliance, to test things. Send me an e-mail. -- [link\|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net\|greg], [link\|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry\|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ *i_wethey* [link\|http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=134485&cid=11233230\|"Microsoft Security" is an even better oxymoron than "Military Intelligence"] No matter how much Microsoft supporters whine about how Linux and other operating systems have just as many bugs as their operating systems do, the bottom line is that the serious, gut-wrenching problems happen on Windows, not on Linux, not on Mac OS. -- [link\|http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1622086,00.asp\|source]
Post #200,700 by broomberg 3/26/05 11:43:18 PM Reply	emailed

Hey Greg - Samba question - (broomberg) - (8) - March 26, 2005, 05:58:30 PM EST

Probably netbios issues - (folkert) - (7) - March 26, 2005, 08:11:23 PM EST

Would it be bad to enable it? - (broomberg) - (6) - March 26, 2005, 08:30:43 PM EST

Okay, Shouldn't be a problem. - (folkert) - (5) - March 26, 2005, 11:10:13 PM EST

Same result - (broomberg) - (4) - March 26, 2005, 11:20:12 PM EST

Hmmm - (folkert) - (3) - March 26, 2005, 11:26:00 PM EST

Nope -NT - (broomberg) - (2) - March 26, 2005, 11:28:40 PM EST

I am going to be doing the - (folkert) - (1) - March 26, 2005, 11:29:53 PM EST

emailed -NT - (broomberg) - March 26, 2005, 11:43:18 PM EST

iwethey.org

Goomba.
67 ms