IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Windows vX.X Forum / You sure I don't want fake oplocks instead?
Post #200,399
by broomberg
3/24/05 8:08:57 PM
Reply
New You sure I don't want fake oplocks instead?
Post #200,464
by folkert
Picture of folkert
3/25/05 11:31:09 AM
Reply
New NEVER.
That option is only for seriously Broken software.

Never. I just can't imagine.
--
[link|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net|greg],
[link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ iwethey

[link|http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=134485&cid=11233230|"Microsoft Security" is an even better oxymoron than "Military Intelligence"]
No matter how much Microsoft supporters whine about how Linux and other operating systems have just as many bugs as their operating systems do, the bottom line is that the serious, gut-wrenching problems happen on Windows, not on Linux, not on Mac OS. -- [link|http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1622086,00.asp|source]
     File locking problem - (broomberg) - (22) - March 24, 2005, 06:39:39 PM EST
         I would assume that... - (ben_tilly) - (3) - March 24, 2005, 07:15:13 PM EST
             Grrr... - (broomberg) - (2) - March 24, 2005, 07:58:29 PM EST
                 I'm guessing, obviously - (ben_tilly) - March 25, 2005, 01:22:46 AM EST
                 I'm guessing, obviously - (ben_tilly) - March 25, 2005, 01:22:51 AM EST
         Turn off Opportunistic locking for those files. - (folkert) - (11) - March 24, 2005, 07:55:10 PM EST
             I was thinking of the same thing - (broomberg) - March 24, 2005, 08:00:05 PM EST
             Done - (broomberg) - (3) - March 24, 2005, 08:07:37 PM EST
                 You sure I don't want fake oplocks instead? -NT - (broomberg) - (1) - March 24, 2005, 08:08:57 PM EST
                     NEVER. - (folkert) - March 25, 2005, 11:31:09 AM EST
                 Not that I am aware of. Of course... - (folkert) - March 25, 2005, 11:33:02 AM EST
             And "blocking locks" should be set to off. -NT - (Andrew Grygus) - (5) - March 24, 2005, 08:42:16 PM EST
                 Err? - (broomberg) - (4) - March 24, 2005, 09:06:07 PM EST
                     I've seen it produce time-outs. -NT - (Andrew Grygus) - March 24, 2005, 09:08:21 PM EST
                     I've seen it produce time-outs. -NT - (Andrew Grygus) - (2) - March 24, 2005, 09:08:33 PM EST
                         In that case: Done -NT - (broomberg) - March 24, 2005, 09:12:33 PM EST
                         And double posts, too! ;-) -NT - (Yendor) - March 24, 2005, 10:44:22 PM EST
         If the various suggestions don't help - (jbrabeck) - (4) - March 24, 2005, 08:23:29 PM EST
             I hate timing dependant problems! - (broomberg) - (1) - March 24, 2005, 09:02:48 PM EST
                 First time I saw it was in COBOL class - (jbrabeck) - March 24, 2005, 10:08:29 PM EST
             Done. And I added another move - (broomberg) - (1) - March 24, 2005, 09:10:31 PM EST
                 Lemme know if it worked. -NT - (jbrabeck) - March 24, 2005, 10:04:37 PM EST
         Happens when you delete a file and it's opened elsewhere - (ChrisR) - March 25, 2005, 02:56:48 PM EST

Who moved my cheese? A narcotic direction to negotiate to the change in its work and its life.
289 ms