Re: SATA vs SCSI

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #200,187 by cwbrenn 3/23/05 5:48:23 PM Reply	Re: SATA vs SCSI I don't know if ATA has caught up yet, but SCSI has always been able to do multiple reads and writes to the drive... which is good if you're doing a lot of reading and writing to the drive. Also, for a long time studios that did digital recording preferred using SCSI drives because there was less of a chance that there would be digital skipping on those drives. Perhaps ATA caught up? All I've seen is that those drives get bigger and faster... but I haven't heard anything about multiple writes. "We are all born originals -- why is it so many of us die copies?" - Edward Young
Post #200,190 by pwhysall 3/23/05 5:52:08 PM Reply	Google "Tagged Command Queue" Peter [link\|http://www.ubuntulinux.org\|Ubuntu Linux] [link\|http://www.kuro5hin.org\|There is no K5 Cabal] [link\|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org\|Home] Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
Post #200,194 by folkert 3/23/05 6:03:06 PM Reply	Google SATA-II -- [link\|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net\|greg], [link\|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry\|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ *i_wethey* [link\|http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=134485&cid=11233230\|"Microsoft Security" is an even better oxymoron than "Military Intelligence"] No matter how much Microsoft supporters whine about how Linux and other operating systems have just as many bugs as their operating systems do, the bottom line is that the serious, gut-wrenching problems happen on Windows, not on Linux, not on Mac OS. -- [link\|http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1622086,00.asp\|source]

SATA vs SCSI - (jbrabeck) - (11) - March 23, 2005, 03:21:39 PM EST

Re: SATA vs SCSI - (cwbrenn) - (2) - March 23, 2005, 05:48:23 PM EST

Google "Tagged Command Queue" -NT - (pwhysall) - March 23, 2005, 05:52:08 PM EST

Google SATA-II -NT - (folkert) - March 23, 2005, 06:03:06 PM EST

I'm not looking for specs - (jbrabeck) - (5) - March 23, 2005, 08:09:23 PM EST

IIRC that's IGM, btw, OK? -NT - (drewk) - (1) - March 23, 2005, 08:21:15 PM EST

Thank you. I knew we had a TLA for it. couldn't thunk it. -NT - (jbrabeck) - March 23, 2005, 09:29:09 PM EST

SATA is nice. - (Another Scott) - March 23, 2005, 08:36:07 PM EST

Here ya go - (broomberg) - (1) - March 23, 2005, 08:37:32 PM EST

Thanks Barry, Just what I was looking for. -NT - (jbrabeck) - March 23, 2005, 09:29:40 PM EST

According to the drive/controller industry . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (1) - March 24, 2005, 02:39:18 AM EST

SSCSI is really... - (folkert) - March 24, 2005, 09:10:44 AM EST

iwethey.org

Everybody knows the 'Linux' facade is just the skorry chepooka, til we shvat the strack of Vesch 6.66a.
47 ms