I give up.

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #199,008 by FuManChu 3/16/05 11:48:09 AM Reply	I give up. But I'm starting to get annoyed at how many of my Google searches lately have JSON near the top of the list. Who needs JSON when you have eval()?
Post #199,009 by admin 3/16/05 11:50:22 AM Reply	? JSON isn't code, it's a data format. What does that have to do with eval()? Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Post #199,014 by FuManChu 3/16/05 11:53:46 AM Reply	It's a data format that has to be parsed by code. Even their "JSON in Javascript" page has parsing/JSON-object-production code.
Post #199,018 by admin 3/16/05 11:58:37 AM Reply	Every data format has to be parsed. I still don't see your point with respect to eval()... Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Post #199,043 by FuManChu 3/16/05 1:15:40 PM Reply	I'm misleading myself Looks like they already use eval() to convert JSON to JS. I saw the JS-to-JSON "stringify" code and must have assumed there were equally ugly conversions in the other direction.

JSON - (admin) - (19) - March 16, 2005, 08:58:05 AM EST

That language is included in the first paragraph. - (folkert) - (10) - March 16, 2005, 11:26:50 AM EST

Not the one *I'm* thinking of... -NT - (admin) - (9) - March 16, 2005, 11:41:21 AM EST

Hmmm... - (folkert) - (8) - March 16, 2005, 11:47:01 AM EST

Re: Hmmm... - (admin) - (7) - March 16, 2005, 11:47:22 AM EST

migosh. - (folkert) - (1) - March 16, 2005, 11:53:02 AM EST

Re: migosh. - (admin) - March 16, 2005, 11:59:27 AM EST

Its not plists though - (tuberculosis) - (4) - Aug. 21, 2007, 06:41:10 AM EDT

Re: Its not plists though - (admin) - (3) - March 16, 2005, 02:18:31 PM EST

Re: Its not plists though - (tuberculosis) - (2) - Aug. 21, 2007, 06:41:22 AM EDT

If that's the only change it's easy enough to make. -NT - (admin) - (1) - March 16, 2005, 04:04:27 PM EST

Not sure that's the only one - (tuberculosis) - Aug. 21, 2007, 12:37:46 PM EDT

I give up. - (FuManChu) - (4) - March 16, 2005, 11:48:09 AM EST

? - (admin) - (3) - March 16, 2005, 11:50:22 AM EST

It's a data format that has to be parsed by code. - (FuManChu) - (2) - March 16, 2005, 11:53:46 AM EST

Every data format has to be parsed. - (admin) - (1) - March 16, 2005, 11:58:37 AM EST

I'm misleading myself - (FuManChu) - March 16, 2005, 01:15:40 PM EST

I may be missing something - (drewk) - (2) - March 16, 2005, 11:57:01 AM EST

Re: I may be missing something - (admin) - (1) - March 16, 2005, 11:59:31 AM EST

We just did this today - (drewk) - March 16, 2005, 12:07:57 PM EST