re your last (quote).
I've occasionally wondered if the mass-market UAV's appeal is mainly to the latent survivalist - those not quite willing to go the whole route with secret cabin at end of a dirt road, buried fuel, ammo, freeze-dried, etc. Maybe kinda the 'lazy survivalist's' pipe dream?
As in - most everybody may be either infected, radiated or puking lungs out from mustard-gas, but *I* shall drive my Colossus over their heaped burned bodies ---> to umm Somewhere Safe\ufffd. And in AC comfort, with good tunes on the jukebox, a few cases of Evian and the Glock in the glove box, while sweetie loads the spare clips.
I mean.. since prolly most realize they *won't* ever be climbing the Alps (or even Mam Tor in the Pennines) -- WTF else makes any sense - even in that shadow world of taking 5+ years to pay off a $30K big toy. Rationalization is everything but.. Expeditions! for a NYC dweller ??
I guess it's just evidence of the poverty of relying upon 'ownership' of a mass of unpaid-for stuff, in substitute for certain absent non-stuff.. making it all very sad or hilarious, depending on mood.
So finally I wonder how this proposition would fly in such a milieu, after all which has occurred:
OK Guys: if you'll go back to 2500# adequate transportation, finance Hydrogen development (infrastructure to make that universally obtainable) - we can phase out the support for the antedeluvian Saudi Wah'habi Looneys, stop pretending they don't subjugate and terrorize half their population (the female half) and otherwise behave like mini-Taleban Assholes. Ditto for Kuwait et al - let'em duel with Saddam for local entertainment.
Deal ???
(Could it make for the next election's more interesting platform?)
Ashton