IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Theory and Practice of Programming Forum / Re: Same old bullshit.
Post #194,757
by johnu
2/15/05 11:08:12 AM
Reply
New Re: Same old bullshit.
Still pretending you've never heard of Delphi, eh?

If I had my choice, I'd do it in Smalltalk...
Post #196,170
by CRConrad
2/24/05 2:29:35 AM
Reply
New And WTF does that have to do with anything?
John U gibbers:
If I had my choice, I'd do it in Smalltalk...
So what? Apparently you don't have a free choice, but are constrained in that you need, as you put it earlier:
We don't want to risk developing with Microsoft beta software
Dunno if youy knew this, but Delphi actually is neither Microsoft nor beta software.

and we are stuck with .Net because all the developers here want a quick, easy GUI builder.
Which is exactly what Delphi is.

Well, except that you aren't stuck with em-ess-dot-net if you use Delphi; it's a quick, easy GUI builder for both .Net and regular Win-32 apps.

So what exactly was your excuse, again, for pretending that it doesn't exist?

Just wondering, you know...


   [link|mailto:MyUserId@MyISP.CountryCode|Christian R. Conrad]
(I live in Finland, and my e-mail in-box is at the Saunalahti company.)
Your lies are of Microsoftian Scale and boring to boot. Your 'depression' may be the closest you ever come to recognizing truth: you have no 'inferiority complex', you are inferior - and something inside you recognizes this. - [link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=71575|Ashton Brown]
Post #196,219
by johnu
2/24/05 1:02:01 PM
Reply
New Re: And WTF does that have to do with anything?
Before I came here, they tried to build a Windows version of the old COBOL software using Delphi and failed. The second try in PowerBuilder succeeded. Somehow, I don't think introducing Delphi will elicit a positive response.
Post #196,601
by CRConrad
2/28/05 9:20:51 AM
Reply
New OK, so what you originally said was only half the story.
Left out the bit about how they inexplicably screwed up something that to anyone sane just shouldn't be screwuppable... (Did they try to write a COBOL app in Delphi, or WTF?)

Oh well, never mind.


   [link|mailto:MyUserId@MyISP.CountryCode|Christian R. Conrad]
(I live in Finland, and my e-mail in-box is at the Saunalahti company.)
Your lies are of Microsoftian Scale and boring to boot. Your 'depression' may be the closest you ever come to recognizing truth: you have no 'inferiority complex', you are inferior - and something inside you recognizes this. - [link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=71575|Ashton Brown]
     The joys of .Net - (johnu) - (53) - Feb. 4, 2005, 04:55:37 PM EST
         Ick. - (admin) - (18) - Feb. 4, 2005, 05:25:35 PM EST
             It warn't me - (jb4) - Feb. 23, 2005, 10:45:57 AM EST
             Here != IWETHEY in this case. -NT - (admin) - Feb. 23, 2005, 11:35:24 AM EST
             So what's a good java IDE to use? - (drewk) - (15) - Feb. 23, 2005, 11:59:55 AM EST
                 Intellij IDEA - (admin) - (14) - Feb. 23, 2005, 12:21:31 PM EST
                     While learning, free is good - (drewk) - (10) - Feb. 23, 2005, 12:26:47 PM EST
                         Checkout Eclipse - (johnu) - (9) - Feb. 23, 2005, 12:45:16 PM EST
                             I despise that program - (tuberculosis) - (6) - Feb. 23, 2005, 05:18:38 PM EST
                                 I'm no psychic... - (pwhysall) - (3) - Feb. 23, 2005, 05:23:00 PM EST
                                     You ought to work in the circus -NT - (tuberculosis) - (1) - Feb. 23, 2005, 07:22:18 PM EST
                                         I come here. Next best thing. -NT - (pwhysall) - Feb. 24, 2005, 01:35:41 AM EST
                                     I think IDEA is good - I use it when I do Java - (tuberculosis) - Feb. 23, 2005, 07:24:52 PM EST
                                 ICLRPD (new thread) - (ben_tilly) - Feb. 23, 2005, 05:28:09 PM EST
                                 It's all relative - (johnu) - Feb. 24, 2005, 01:04:26 PM EST
                             I am such a lUser - (drewk) - (1) - Feb. 24, 2005, 01:07:28 PM EST
                                 Look at the pretty COLORS! -NT - (jb4) - Feb. 25, 2005, 02:40:53 PM EST
                     Concur - (jb4) - (2) - Feb. 23, 2005, 05:09:23 PM EST
                         As a rabid, frothing Emacs user - (admin) - Feb. 23, 2005, 05:31:00 PM EST
                         Another vote for Intellij - (bluke) - Feb. 24, 2005, 05:28:41 AM EST
         Listeners - (warmachine) - (1) - Feb. 4, 2005, 07:36:48 PM EST
             Re: Listeners - (johnu) - Feb. 4, 2005, 11:08:19 PM EST
         Crap and Double Crap -NT - (tuberculosis) - (10) - Feb. 5, 2005, 12:00:27 AM EST
             Interesting thing is... - (johnu) - (9) - Feb. 5, 2005, 10:12:02 AM EST
                 Umm... Squeak? -NT - (folkert) - (1) - Feb. 5, 2005, 10:31:49 AM EST
                     Re: Umm... "up to date Windows UIs" -NT - (altmann) - Feb. 5, 2005, 04:13:54 PM EST
                 Looked at Dolphin? - (tuberculosis) - Feb. 6, 2005, 12:02:26 AM EST
                 Going farther afield - (ben_tilly) - (5) - Feb. 6, 2005, 01:21:06 AM EST
                     You lose a lot of power though - (tuberculosis) - (4) - Feb. 8, 2005, 01:28:51 PM EST
                         Re: You lose a lot of power though - (JimWeirich) - (3) - Feb. 8, 2005, 11:08:43 PM EST
                             Is the parser written in Ruby? - (tuberculosis) - (2) - Feb. 9, 2005, 12:48:20 PM EST
                                 Just like C# and .Net - (mmoffitt) - Feb. 9, 2005, 02:26:55 PM EST
                                 Re: Is the parser written in Ruby? - (JimWeirich) - Feb. 9, 2005, 05:55:31 PM EST
         #3 will be possible in C# 2.0 - (altmann) - (1) - Feb. 9, 2005, 06:43:11 PM EST
             But it's gonna be great! -NT - (mmoffitt) - Feb. 9, 2005, 06:55:59 PM EST
         C# 2.0 - (johnu) - (17) - Feb. 11, 2005, 10:01:14 AM EST
             Strong typing bites itself in the gonads once again - (FuManChu) - (2) - Feb. 11, 2005, 11:16:29 AM EST
                 Any production quality dynamic languages for .NET yet - (johnu) - (1) - Feb. 11, 2005, 11:28:01 AM EST
                     Not that I've seen. - (FuManChu) - Feb. 11, 2005, 02:26:02 PM EST
             Objects to the rescue - (johnu) - (13) - Feb. 11, 2005, 04:42:00 PM EST
                 Sounds reasonable - (FuManChu) - (6) - Feb. 12, 2005, 02:09:08 PM EST
                     Wibble, wibble... - (CRConrad) - (4) - Feb. 14, 2005, 04:15:32 AM EST
                         Semantics - (FuManChu) - (3) - Feb. 14, 2005, 11:17:46 AM EST
                             A) Almost everything is, when you get down to it; and B)... - (CRConrad) - (2) - Feb. 14, 2005, 05:13:14 PM EST
                                 English is simply too flexible to be used well. - (FuManChu) - (1) - Feb. 15, 2005, 12:54:43 AM EST
                                     Yeah, I know - but it makes for a funny contrast... - (CRConrad) - Feb. 15, 2005, 02:41:54 AM EST
                     Re: Sounds reasonable - (johnu) - Feb. 15, 2005, 11:11:25 AM EST
                 Same old bullshit. - (CRConrad) - (5) - Feb. 14, 2005, 03:59:59 AM EST
                     I second that -NT - (warmachine) - Feb. 14, 2005, 08:57:54 AM EST
                     Re: Same old bullshit. - (johnu) - (3) - Feb. 15, 2005, 11:08:12 AM EST
                         And WTF does that have to do with anything? - (CRConrad) - (2) - Feb. 24, 2005, 02:29:35 AM EST
                             Re: And WTF does that have to do with anything? - (johnu) - (1) - Feb. 24, 2005, 01:02:01 PM EST
                                 OK, so what you originally said was only half the story. - (CRConrad) - Feb. 28, 2005, 09:20:51 AM EST
         OT: Inner/outer classes. (new thread) - (pwhysall) - Feb. 14, 2005, 05:27:22 AM EST

Many died, but in the end, the chickens won.
123 ms