The thing about purity tests

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #190,908

by drewk

1/19/05 11:45:30 PM

The thing about purity tests

They always asked the wrong questoin. Not, "Have you ever ... ?" But, "Would you ever, if you could get someone to say yes?" That's the number I'm interested in.

Oh, ummm ... if you're a hot chick and all.

I mean, who cares what another guy gets on one of those. Fag.</flashback>

===

Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link|http://DocHope.com|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats].
[link|http://DocHope.com|http://DocHope.com]

Now you can PROVE your nerdliness - (FuManChu) - (61) - Jan. 19, 2005, 10:56:20 AM EST

KNEEL, MORTAL! - (inthane-chan) - Jan. 19, 2005, 11:06:43 AM EST

That's unpossible! 98 Nerd King God - (Silverlock) - Jan. 19, 2005, 01:42:40 PM EST

Awww. Only an 87. -NT - (imric) - (5) - Jan. 19, 2005, 11:14:56 AM EST

82 -NT - (bepatient) - (2) - Jan. 19, 2005, 01:33:35 PM EST

I fault WVU. - (imric) - Jan. 19, 2005, 01:43:48 PM EST

Me also -NT - (bluke) - Jan. 20, 2005, 06:45:25 AM EST

Me too -NT - (Arkadiy) - Jan. 19, 2005, 01:45:46 PM EST

Same -NT - (broomberg) - Jan. 19, 2005, 07:07:55 PM EST

Got 75%. - (jake123) - (7) - Jan. 19, 2005, 11:41:52 AM EST

That depends on your definition of "badly"... -NT - (inthane-chan) - (6) - Jan. 19, 2005, 11:43:15 AM EST

Pretty much - (jake123) - (5) - Jan. 19, 2005, 11:44:33 AM EST

I had the opposite problem. - (inthane-chan) - (4) - Jan. 19, 2005, 11:47:12 AM EST

The first time I took a purity test .... - (Silverlock) - (3) - Jan. 19, 2005, 11:56:11 AM EST

My result was so high... - (broomberg) - (2) - Jan. 19, 2005, 07:09:12 PM EST

Somehow, I'm not surprised at this, Barry. ;-) -NT - (n3jja) - (1) - Jan. 19, 2005, 08:21:55 PM EST

The thing about purity tests - (drewk) - Jan. 19, 2005, 11:45:30 PM EST

I didn't know I was this big a loser. 87 - (mmoffitt) - (1) - Jan. 19, 2005, 12:02:43 PM EST

*shakes hand* - (imric) - Jan. 19, 2005, 12:04:39 PM EST

53 -NT - (drewk) - (2) - Jan. 19, 2005, 12:07:37 PM EST

Take it again and cheat this time! ;-) -NT - (lincoln) - (1) - Jan. 19, 2005, 03:30:58 PM EST

Re: Take it again and cheat this time! ;-) - (Steven A S) - Jan. 19, 2005, 03:40:24 PM EST

I don't know - (tjsinclair) - (4) - Jan. 19, 2005, 12:11:00 PM EST

Ooh, irony -NT - (drewk) - (3) - Jan. 19, 2005, 12:19:42 PM EST

On the other hand - (tjsinclair) - (2) - Jan. 19, 2005, 01:59:03 PM EST

Did you break the link there, too? -NT - (drewk) - (1) - Jan. 19, 2005, 06:47:41 PM EST

Nope - (tjsinclair) - Jan. 19, 2005, 07:30:44 PM EST

Sheesh. 93 - Nerd King. -NT - (Another Scott) - Jan. 19, 2005, 12:40:48 PM EST

This test would be easy to cheat . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (5) - Jan. 19, 2005, 01:44:52 PM EST

I'm a Total loser - 91! -NT - (broomberg) - (4) - Jan. 19, 2005, 07:15:40 PM EST

Funny, I got a 22 -NT - (drewk) - Jan. 19, 2005, 07:19:19 PM EST

I'm a Loser. 81. :-/ -NT - (Another Scott) - Jan. 19, 2005, 07:27:48 PM EST

69! My favorite number! ;-) -NT - (n3jja) - (1) - Jan. 19, 2005, 08:27:23 PM EST

Yup: nerd -NT - (drewk) - Jan. 19, 2005, 11:49:12 PM EST

63 - Low Rank Nerd -NT - (Steven A S) - Jan. 19, 2005, 03:06:04 PM EST

56. Phew, I must have a *bit* of a life :) -NT - (Meerkat) - Jan. 19, 2005, 03:32:40 PM EST

What? Only a 74%? Something's gotta be wrong. - (Yendor) - (1) - Jan. 19, 2005, 04:07:38 PM EST

No, by using that link . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - Jan. 19, 2005, 08:06:23 PM EST

Nerdier than I thought! - 90% -NT - (jbrabeck) - Jan. 19, 2005, 04:55:42 PM EST

Same here - (Nightowl) - (1) - Jan. 19, 2005, 05:22:51 PM EST

And John is.... - (Nightowl) - Jan. 19, 2005, 10:53:43 PM EST

Re: Now you can PROVE your nerdliness - (Steve Lowe) - Jan. 19, 2005, 05:33:38 PM EST

61 -NT - (daemon) - Jan. 19, 2005, 06:03:39 PM EST

Re: Now you can PROVE your nerdliness - (SpiceWare) - (1) - Jan. 19, 2005, 07:08:09 PM EST

You should have gotten more points with your ani-gif. :-) -NT - (Another Scott) - Jan. 19, 2005, 07:10:26 PM EST

64, but I knew that already. -NT - (n3jja) - Jan. 19, 2005, 07:28:07 PM EST

70. - (static) - Jan. 19, 2005, 07:59:43 PM EST

Bow down, foolish mortals. - (admin) - (5) - Jan. 19, 2005, 09:22:17 PM EST

You should ask your wife what she thinks. :-) -NT - (static) - Jan. 19, 2005, 09:33:01 PM EST

Was there any doubt? You are **admin** after all. :-) -NT - (Another Scott) - Jan. 19, 2005, 09:44:03 PM EST

Bow to your new overlord... - (folkert) - (2) - Jan. 20, 2005, 01:46:20 AM EST

:-) -NT - (Another Scott) - Jan. 20, 2005, 09:27:36 AM EST

Do you want the IQ test now? -NT - (gdaustin) - Jan. 20, 2005, 09:34:44 PM EST

84 for me. -NT - (a6l6e6x) - Jan. 19, 2005, 10:53:32 PM EST

Supreme Nerd God - (gdaustin) - (1) - Jan. 20, 2005, 12:09:37 AM EST

That's one of the things that lowered my actual score - (Steven A S) - Jan. 20, 2005, 09:34:33 AM EST

Oh dearie dearie me. - (pwhysall) - (1) - Jan. 20, 2005, 10:42:09 AM EST

HP 41C - (gdaustin) - Jan. 20, 2005, 09:33:44 PM EST

WTF... 92 ?!? - (CRConrad) - Jan. 21, 2005, 02:19:46 AM EST

97%.... - (slugbug) - (1) - Jan. 22, 2005, 07:21:30 PM EST

I.C.L.R.P.D. (new thread) - (folkert) - Jan. 23, 2005, 10:49:30 AM EST

Not fair - (tuberculosis) - Feb. 8, 2005, 02:33:37 PM EST

iwethey.org

Sufficiently advanced so as to be indistinguishable from magic.
171 ms