Post #184,783
11/22/04 11:50:21 AM
11/22/04 3:30:54 PM
|
How am I supposed to do any convinving?
I don't even know what that is.
[Edit] You're just noticing?
Thanks for the heads up. Will be checking/fixing tonight. I don't think I've got anything that'll be affected.
===
Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link|http://DocHope.com|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats].
[link|http://DocHope.com|http://DocHope.com]
Edited by drewk
Nov. 22, 2004, 03:30:54 PM EST
|
Post #184,806
11/22/04 1:34:54 PM
|
You should be conniving...
...in any attempt at convincing.
|
Post #184,891
11/23/04 3:38:22 PM
|
PHP users on knight. I enabled Safe_Mode=On
see if everything still works. I turned on safe_mode in PHP. I included the /usr/share/php/ directory for includes... so things would work for me.
I don't see any problems, but then I am a casual user.
But, we shouldn't see anymore daemons run by www-data... from /tmp or /var/tmp or /dev/shm either... (all have the temp-bit) I am removing /dev/shm... not needed anymore.
-- [link|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net|greg], [link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ iwetheyNo matter how much Microsoft supporters whine about how Linux and other operating systems have just as many bugs as their operating systems do, the bottom line is that the serious, gut-wrenching problems happen on Windows, not on Linux, not on Mac OS. -- [link|http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1622086,00.asp|source]Here is an example: [link|http://www.greymagic.com/security/advisories/gm001-ie/|Executing arbitrary commands without Active Scripting or ActiveX when using Windows]
|
Post #184,899
11/23/04 5:28:27 PM
|
Are you disallowing image loads from remote servers?
The PayPal cart page loads my logo from knight, and it's not showing up.
===
Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link|http://DocHope.com|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats].
[link|http://DocHope.com|http://DocHope.com]
|
Post #184,900
11/23/04 6:10:18 PM
11/23/04 6:11:21 PM
|
Look closely. I see it. And no I am not blocking refs
Take a look at the specific code. <table align="center" border="0" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" class="cowpImage" bgcolor="006699">\n<tr><td><table align="center" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%"><tr>\n<td align="left" nowrap valign="middle" style="background-image: url(http://dochope.com/images/dochope_logo_paypal.gif);\nbackground-repeat: no-repeat; background-position: left; width: 750px; height: 90px;"> </td>\n<td width="100%"> </td></tr></table></td></tr></table> What if anything do you see? I see a problem. here is the css: [link|https://www.paypal.com/css/xpt.css|xpt.css] not that it matters... but to remove its possibility. -- [link|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net|greg], [link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ iwetheyNo matter how much Microsoft supporters whine about how Linux and other operating systems have just as many bugs as their operating systems do, the bottom line is that the serious, gut-wrenching problems happen on Windows, not on Linux, not on Mac OS. -- [link|http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1622086,00.asp|source]Here is an example: [link|http://www.greymagic.com/security/advisories/gm001-ie/|Executing arbitrary commands without Active Scripting or ActiveX when using Windows]
Edited by folkert
Nov. 23, 2004, 06:11:21 PM EST
|
Post #184,906
11/23/04 7:03:43 PM
|
Yeah, looked at that
And I've tried turning off Privoxy and modifying privacy setting in Firefox. Can't get it. But as long as other people can, I'll accept that I'm doing something overly paranoid with my browser config.
===
Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link|http://DocHope.com|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats].
[link|http://DocHope.com|http://DocHope.com]
|
Post #184,912
11/23/04 8:55:54 PM
|
You missed my point.
I can see it there just not under the color "006699",
The background color is over top the back ground image. The CSS is fscked.
-- [link|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net|greg], [link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ iwetheyNo matter how much Microsoft supporters whine about how Linux and other operating systems have just as many bugs as their operating systems do, the bottom line is that the serious, gut-wrenching problems happen on Windows, not on Linux, not on Mac OS. -- [link|http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1622086,00.asp|source]Here is an example: [link|http://www.greymagic.com/security/advisories/gm001-ie/|Executing arbitrary commands without Active Scripting or ActiveX when using Windows]
|
Post #184,915
11/23/04 9:15:02 PM
|
That *should* work (CSS issue) (new thread)
Created as new thread #184914 titled [link|/forums/render/content/show?contentid=184914|That *should* work (CSS issue)]
===
Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link|http://DocHope.com|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats].
[link|http://DocHope.com|http://DocHope.com]
|
Post #189,164
1/5/05 7:56:24 PM
|
That isn't the problem
<table align="center" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%"><tr>\r\n<td align="left" nowrap valign="middle" style="background-image: url(http://dochope.com/images/dochope_logo_paypal.gif); background-repeat: no-repeat; background-position: left; width: 750px; height: 90px;"> </td>\r\n<td width="100%"> </td>\r\n</tr></table> The problem is InternetExplorer interprets the "100%" as 100% of what's left in the container after taking out the 750px for the first cell. Mozilla and Firefox take 100% of the container and truncate the cell that asked for 750px. This looks like a Gecko rendering bug to me. Unless the W3C spec says to take percentages before absolute values, which I doubt. ===\r\n\r\nPurveyor of Doc Hope's [link|http://DocHope.com|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats].\r\nhttp://DocHope.com
|
Post #189,189
1/6/05 12:07:00 AM
|
I'd file a bug on it.
-- [link|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net|greg], [link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ iwethey[link|http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=134485&cid=11233230|"Microsoft Security" is an even better oxymoron than "Miltary Intelligence"] No matter how much Microsoft supporters whine about how Linux and other operating systems have just as many bugs as their operating systems do, the bottom line is that the serious, gut-wrenching problems happen on Windows, not on Linux, not on Mac OS. -- [link|http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1622086,00.asp|source]
|
Post #189,194
1/6/05 2:02:13 AM
|
Done
[link|https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=277232|https://bugzilla.moz...bug.cgi?id=277232]
===
Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link|http://DocHope.com|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats].
[link|http://DocHope.com|http://DocHope.com]
|
Post #189,216
1/6/05 12:21:13 PM
|
Got Bernd, I see.
Nice. Heavy dude.
Even when he quoth thee W3C, you qouth back using such his own weapon against him. Nice tactic, he can't deny it.
-- [link|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net|greg], [link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ iwethey[link|http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=134485&cid=11233230|"Microsoft Security" is an even better oxymoron than "Miltary Intelligence"] No matter how much Microsoft supporters whine about how Linux and other operating systems have just as many bugs as their operating systems do, the bottom line is that the serious, gut-wrenching problems happen on Windows, not on Linux, not on Mac OS. -- [link|http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1622086,00.asp|source]
|
Post #189,237
1/6/05 5:04:42 PM
|
Hmm, interesting response
I'm looking at my test case side-by-side in Mozilla and Firefox on Linux, and Firefox and Internet Explorer on Windows. One of these things is not like the others. Guess which?
===
Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link|http://DocHope.com|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats].
[link|http://DocHope.com|http://DocHope.com]
|
Post #189,252
1/6/05 7:12:21 PM
|
Actually, I can't see a difference.
I pasted the fragment you put in the bug into a file and viewed it via IE6 (XPsp2), FireFox 1.0 and Opera 7.54. They all display it the same way: the first cell in the first table is all squashed up.
Wade.
Is it enough to love
Is it enough to breathe
Somebody rip my heart out
And leave me here to bleed
| |
Is it enough to die
Somebody save my life
I'd rather be Anything but Ordinary
Please
| -- "Anything but Ordinary" by Avril Lavigne. |
|
Post #189,308
1/7/05 12:11:16 PM
|
Screenshot (9k gif) (new thread)
Created as new thread #189307 titled [link|/forums/render/content/show?contentid=189307|Screenshot (9k gif)]
===
Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link|http://DocHope.com|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats].
[link|http://DocHope.com|http://DocHope.com]
|
Post #189,250
1/6/05 6:40:08 PM
1/6/05 6:43:20 PM
|
One thing that always causes me grief...
...is that I have a lot of tables that go wider than the display size - when you've got possibly a hundred columns in a table, it can be hard to view in the monitor width. Anyway, once the table exceeds the window boundary, the table layout rules should give up trying to squeeze it back in. Similar to the way lists used to operate in the IWE forums where the right shift would eventually mean that you get one word per line.
Not that this has anything to do with you current predicament... But it reminds me that the one column says use 100% while the other is not 0%... I've seen that method used not infrequently, but I still I'm not comfortable with it.
Edit Note: The other thing I wonder is whether specifying the width attribute in the style in the first column but doing it in the td attribute in the other is the problem. Will it work if they are both set in the same manner (i.e. both as width= or both as style='width:").
Edited by ChrisR
Jan. 6, 2005, 06:43:20 PM EST
|
