IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Unix Forum / I'll be interested to see
Post #181,967
by imric
11/1/04 7:45:02 AM
Reply
New I'll be interested to see
what server / OS it runs on.
Imric's Tips for Living
  • Paranoia Is a Survival Trait
  • Pessimists are never disappointed - but sometimes, if they are very lucky, they can be pleasantly surprised...
  • Even though everyone is out to get you, it doesn't matter unless you let them win.


Nothing is as simple as it seems in the beginning,
As hopeless as it seems in the middle,
Or as finished as it seems in the end.
 
 
Post #181,968
by pwhysall
Picture of pwhysall
11/1/04 7:46:03 AM
Reply
New Winders, I bet.
But anyway, it's all academic; once Slashdot gets hold of the story, the thing will be reduced to a smoking ruin irrespective of OS/httpd.

Peter
[link|http://www.debian.org|Shill For Hire]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Home]
Post #181,970
by imric
11/1/04 9:04:57 AM
Reply
New DOS ATTACK!
Slashdot attacks prosco (or scoinfo, or whatever) in an obvious coordinated, terroristic action against that most noble and put-upon corporate hero, SCO...

I can see it now...
Imric's Tips for Living
  • Paranoia Is a Survival Trait
  • Pessimists are never disappointed - but sometimes, if they are very lucky, they can be pleasantly surprised...
  • Even though everyone is out to get you, it doesn't matter unless you let them win.


Nothing is as simple as it seems in the beginning,
As hopeless as it seems in the middle,
Or as finished as it seems in the end.
 
 
Post #182,067
by folkert
Picture of folkert
11/1/04 4:37:54 PM
Reply
New NMAP of the IP. 
Starting nmap 3.75 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2004-11-01 16:34 EST\nInitiating SYN Stealth Scan against scoinfo.com (216.250.128.211) [1663 ports] at 16:34\nDiscovered open port 80/tcp on 216.250.128.211\nThe SYN Stealth Scan took 28.15s to scan 1663 total ports.\nInitiating service scan against 1 service on scoinfo.com (216.250.128.211) at 16:35\nThe service scan took 5.16s to scan 1 service on 1 host.\nFor OSScan assuming port 80 is open, 113 is closed, and neither are firewalled\nHost scoinfo.com (216.250.128.211) appears to be up ... good.\nInteresting ports on scoinfo.com (216.250.128.211):\n(The 1661 ports scanned but not shown below are in state: filtered)\nPORT    STATE  SERVICE VERSION\n80/tcp  open   http    Apache httpd 2.0.52 ((Win32) mod_jk2/2.0.4)\n113/tcp closed auth\nDevice type: general purpose\nRunning: Microsoft Windows 95/98/ME|NT/2K/XP\nOS details: Microsoft Windows Millennium Edition (Me), Windows 2000 Pro or Advanced Server, or Windows XP\nTCP Sequence Prediction: Class=random positive increments\n                         Difficulty=7136 (Worthy challenge)\nIPID Sequence Generation: Incremental\n\nNmap run completed -- 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 36.257 seconds
--
[link|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net|greg],
[link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ iwethey
No matter how much Microsoft supporters whine about how Linux and other operating systems have just as many bugs as their operating systems do, the bottom line is that the serious, gut-wrenching problems happen on Windows, not on Linux, not on Mac OS. -- [link|http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1622086,00.asp|source]
Here is an example: [link|http://www.greymagic.com/security/advisories/gm001-ie/|Executing arbitrary commands without Active Scripting or ActiveX when using Windows]
     November 1, 2004: A day that will live in infamy! (edited) - (folkert) - (12) - Nov. 1, 2004, 04:30:39 PM EST
         I'll be interested to see - (imric) - (3) - Nov. 1, 2004, 07:45:02 AM EST
             Winders, I bet. - (pwhysall) - (1) - Nov. 1, 2004, 07:46:03 AM EST
                 DOS ATTACK! - (imric) - Nov. 1, 2004, 09:04:57 AM EST
             NMAP of the IP. - (folkert) - Nov. 1, 2004, 04:37:54 PM EST
         Still can't be found. - (bepatient) - (2) - Nov. 1, 2004, 10:46:48 AM EST
             Re: Still can't be found. - (jake123) - Nov. 1, 2004, 11:16:31 AM EST
             Just like their evidence -NT - (ben_tilly) - Nov. 1, 2004, 11:36:24 AM EST
         They changed the name - (SpiceWare) - (2) - Nov. 1, 2004, 12:23:48 PM EST
             And visiting scoinfo.com - (jbrabeck) - (1) - Nov. 1, 2004, 03:40:24 PM EST
                 finally made it up - (SpiceWare) - Nov. 1, 2004, 04:08:26 PM EST
         The site is on hold - (admin) - (1) - Nov. 2, 2004, 12:37:30 PM EST
             Really? Yeah I saw that. - (folkert) - Nov. 2, 2004, 01:23:44 PM EST

In stereo.
54 ms